Faraday to Charles Babbage   15 September 1832

Royal Institution | Sept 15th 1832.

My dear Sir

I send you herewith an account of the three deposits not however including any notice of their peculiar striated or crystalline appearance hardness &c &c all of which you no doubt already know by inspection[.]

Temple of Serapis 1. This deposit consists principally of Carbonate of lime[.] A little sulphate of lime is present and also a little oxide of iron & Silica with alumina but all together these do not probably make more than 4 or 5 per cent. I can find no magnesia here nor any but the minutest trace of muriates[.]

Piscina Mirabile This is in chemical composition as like the last as possible[.] I do not find a word to alter[.] The state of aggregation is different & the successive deposits are not so evident; it is also more crystalline2[.]

Temple of Minerva. This substance does not contain any carbonate of lime it is essentially sulphate of lime or gypsium with a little oxide of Iron &c &c[.] This composition accounts for its crystalline appearance & other characters[.]

Your first question of "whether the first & second deposits are the same substances nearly in the same proportions" is already answered in the affirmative3[.]

Your second of "whether the combinations they contain are compatible with sea water; could they have been deposited in it?" requires a little more reservation. I cannot say that the carbonate of lime is incompatible with sea water or that it could not have been deposited from it. But I have never heard of such a deposit from the sea water we can procure now a days either naturally or during the evaporation which goes on in salt works &c &c. On the other hand they represent perfectly such deposits as are taking place continually from waters holding carbonate of lime in solution by carbonic acid and I cannot help thinking that such has been their source.

In giving this opinion I am guided merely by the appearance of the deposits & their chemical characters for I know nothing of the circumstances under which they occur although 20 years ago I happened for a few hours to be at the Temple of Serapis4.

I am | Dear Sir | Most Truly Yours | M. Faraday

Charles Babbage | &c &c &c

I have used a little as possible & return you the rest supposing you may require them. | MF


Address: Charles Babbage Esq | &c &c &c | 1 Dorset Street | Manchester Square.

Near Naples. See Babbage (1834, 1847) for his interest in this subject.
See Babbage (1834), 73 where he refers to this analysis. This paragraph is quoted in Babbage (1847), 15.
This and the next two paragraphs are quoted in ibid.
In May 1814 when he was in Naples. See Bowers and Symons (1991), 107-10. This particular visit is not mentioned here, since the manuscript of Faraday's diary for this period has been lost.

Bibliography

BABBAGE, Charles (1834): “Observations on the Temple of Serapis at Pozzuoli,near Naples”, Proc. Geol. Soc., 2: 72-6.

BABBAGE, Charles (1847): Observations on the Temple of Serapis at Pozzuoli near Naples, London.

Please cite as “Faraday0614,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday0614