Faraday to John Barrow   12 December 1832

Royal Institution | 12th Decr 1832

Sir

I have the honor to inclose for the information of My Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty a report upon thirty one samples of oatmeal received on the 8th instant for analytical examination1

and have the honor to be | Sir | Your Obedient Humble Servant | M. Faraday

John Barrow Esq | &c &c &c


Report on thirty one samples of oatmeal received from the hands of Thomas Griffiths2 on the 8th. Dec 1832.

These samples of oatmeal were numbered from 1 to 31 inclusive and were sealed up separately[.] On submitting them to analytical examination I found that they were generally of the same class and character with two which I had the honor to refer to in a former report (of the 4th instant) labled Inglis3 &c &c. All of them contained calcareous matter: evidently added for fraudulent purposes the proportion appeared to be nearly that of the former samples i.e between 10 & 11 per cent but I am not able to speak accurately to the quantities without being allowed more time & pursuing the analyses in a more refined manner[.]

M. Faraday

Royal Institution | 12th Dec 1832


Letter endorsed: 12 Dec. Send for Mr Jones' report[.] A letter of Mr Faraday of yesterday or this morning is wanting. Papers enclosed. Send the papers to Mr. Jones & direct him to prosecute for the penalty[.] JB 13 Dec

See letters 631 and 633.
Unidentified.
William Inglis of 16 Rawstone Street, Goswell Road. He denied contaminating the oatmeal and blamed the miller. See Inglis to Admiralty, 26 December 1832, PRO ADM1 / 4793, f.279.

Please cite as “Faraday0634,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday0634