Faraday to Edward William Brayley   28 May 1836

R Institution | 28 May 1836

My dear Sir

I can trust your memory better than my own for mine is a very bad one & I dare say you are right in your impression[.] I should therefore like the paper altered so as to not to state that Davy did not first show me the report although that has been my strong impression but as it is of no consequence to the general statement it might as well be changed1. I will call at Red Lion court this evening if I can to make the alteration[.]

Some of the things as the ‘Top up’ I remember others I do not. As to the accuracy of the report I have my feelings on the matter and sought for the original M.S. on purpose to do you justice but not finding that could go no further in changing that point[.]

Ever Dear Sir | Most Truly Yours | M. Faraday

E.W. Brayley Esq | &c &c &c

I remember nothing about the communications between Phillips & Davy. I think that must have been “private” to me as well as to others[.] MF

This letter, which seems to be the reply to Brayley to Faraday, c. May 1836, letter 914, volume 2, referred to Faraday (1836). This was published in the June 1836 issue of the Philosophical Magazine and dealt with the controversy over the events surrounding Faraday’s discovery of electro-magnetic rotations in 1821. See p.523 for this specific reference.

Bibliography

FARADAY, Michael (1836): “On the History of the Condensation of the Gases, in reply to Dr. Davy, introduced by some Remarks on that on Electro-magnetic Rotation”, Phil. Mag., 8: 521-9.

Please cite as “Faraday0920a,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday0920a