R Institution | or rather Brighton | 13 Decr. 1848
My dear Sir
I am sorry I cannot supply Mr Hadgetts2 with a ticket for my lectures3 but you know they are not mine in property and the privilege of admission which I possess is of necessity & properly limited[.] Last year at the Easter [lectures,] I think to give him admission to two or three lectures I had to deny my own relative to whom I must now turn. When it is for yourself I will strain every point but you must not ask me for others[.]
The remark you refer to is not in my written paper4 but if it were I should not have to revise it: for it was Barlow5 & not Wollaston6 who shewed mathematically that a tangential action having a certain law would satisfy every condition of the facts of Electro magnetic rotations7. Wollaston spoke of circumferential power8 deducing it from Oersteds results and though he expected rotation could not by his views at that time make it out[.] Barlows was much later & was what I referred to: it illustrated my point Wollastons did not[.]
Ever Truly Yours | M. Faraday
E.W. Brayley Esq | &c &c &c
BARLOW, Peter (1823): An essay on magnetic attractions, 2nd edition, London.
FARADAY, Michael (1823): “Historical Statement respecting Electro-Magnetic Rotation”, Quart. J. Sci., 15: 288-92.
FARADAY, Michael (1836): “On the History of the Condensation of the Gases, in reply to Dr. Davy, introduced by some Remarks on that on Electro-magnetic Rotation”, Phil. Mag., 8: 521-9.
Please cite as “Faraday2135,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 30 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday2135