Faraday to Jacob Herbert   28 February 1851

Royal Institution | 28 Feb 1851

My dear Sir

In reply to your letter of yesterday1 containing the enquiry whether fresh water deposited in leaden cisterns is likely to obtain any quality rendering it prejudicial if used for culinary purposes or for drinking; I may state that there are cases where such injury has occurred & may occur. The liability is proportionate to the purity of the water in respects of Saline matter. Thus pure distilled water will act freely on lead - pure rain water will act sometimes - some spring waters are so pure that they act on the lead of pipes & cisterns. In thus acting they tend to coat the lead with an insoluble compound that serves more or less as a protection, and the protection is more perfect as the water is less pure in salts; especially of a certain kind. The consequence is that new lead cisterns & pipes injure such waters as act upon them more at first than afterwards - and again that a water which being not quite pure can be injured by a new cistern or pipe, ceases to be injured after some time[.]

The cases of injury in practice are not numerous, though they occur. The multitude of instances in which the water is not injured is manifest in London where leaden pipes & cisterns innumerable are properly & safely employed for the conveyance and retention of fresh water. Doubtful cases have to be examined each by itself2[.]

I am My dear Sir | Your faithful Servant | M. Faraday

This letter was read to Trinity House Court, 4 March 1851, GL MS 30004/24, pp.331-2.

Please cite as “Faraday2386,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday2386