Julius Plücker to Faraday   9 February 1853

Dear Sir!

After a longer silence, allow me at first to thank you for your last paper1, I received two months ago. From your admirable activity in science I may conclude, that your health be improved, and I am happy to do so.

I take the liberty to send you my last mémoir2 on the way of library, two former ones3 will have reached you, six months ago, on the same way. The indications you gave of the contents of your lecture at the Royal Institution on magnetic lines of force4, engaged myself to send a paper of mine, unfinished as it was, to Poggendorff. When I was last time at London, I intended to explain to you what it contains, but I desisted to do so in that troublesome period, not thinking then I might meet you in these researches.

I part from the law of the action of an element of the current on a magnetic pole, as given by Biot, immediately after Oerstedt’s discovery5. From that law I deduce the law of the induction of a current by a revolving pole, admitting the Newtonian principle, of the equality of action and reaction, as existing between both classes of phenomena. A pole turning round a conducting wire is acting on this wire as an “electromotrice force”, I deduce the laws of its action, both experimentally and mathematically. In the case of a revolving magnet bar (if you take the case of the Earth) I conclude that there is a tension of negative Electricity in the equatorial zone and a tension of positive one in the arctic regions. &c &c &c.

Mr. Geissler6, our clever artist, constructed a year ago, for the use of wine-makers’, an apparatus, indicating the quantity of alcool, by the tension of the vapours of the mixture mixed with a certain quantity of air, all at the temperature of 100C. This apparatus improved on my advice by excluding all air, is that which Dr. Waller7 bought from Mr. Geissler and for which he took a “brevet” for England8. Dr Hofmann, as it is written to Mr. G., intends to present it at the R. Institution. This apparatus startled me by the regularity of its indications, non [sic] only on mixtures containing alcool but also in many other cases, namely in the case of solutions. I left to Mr Geiss[l]er the care to work out (exploiter) his technical apparatus, reserving to myself, after that was done, to take use of the principle, well known before, but not at all sufficiently appreciated, for scientific researches on the affinity of vapours, on Dalton’s9 law, modified for the case of mixed vapours &c &c. After Dr Waller’s departure I took up the question and I intend now to send to Poggendorff the first part of the results I obtained, assisted by Mr Geissler10. For this purpose new apparatus were constructed, the “Vaporimeter” not being able for scientific researches.

I beg you Sir to present my respects to Mad. Faraday.

Yours very truly | Plücker

Bonn, 9th February | 1853.


Address: Professor Faraday | &c &c | Royal Institution | London.

Probably Faraday (1852d), [ERE29a].
Possibly Plücker (1852b).
Possibly Plücker (1852a) and Plücker and Geissler (1852).
Faraday (1852a), Friday Evening Discourse of 23 January 1852. See Plücker (1852b) which cites this lecture on p.352. Page 107 of the lecture is quoted in extensioby Plücker on p.371.
That is Biot’s comments on Oersted’s discovery of electro-magnetism. Oersted (1820) and Biot (1821). For a discussion of Biot’s views see Gooding (1990), 36-43. See Plücker (1852b), 376-8 for his discussion of Biot’s work.
Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Geissler (1815-1879, DSB). Technician at the University of Bonn from at least 1852.
Augustus Volney Waller (1816-1870, DNB). Physiologist.
Patent 1852/288.
John Dalton (1766-1844, DSB). Chemical philosopher who lived in Manchester. Developed a version of the atomic theory of matter.
This was published as Plücker (1854b) which described the apparatus on pp.199-200.

Bibliography

BIOT, Jean-Baptiste (1821): “Sur l’aimantation imprimée aux métaux par l’électricité en mouvement”, J. Sav., 221-35.

FARADAY, Michael (1852a): “On the Lines of Magnetic Force”, Proc. Roy. Inst., 1: 105-8.

FARADAY, Michael (1852d): “On the Physical Character of the Lines of Magnetic Force”, Phil. Mag., 3: 401-28.

GOODING, David (1990): Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment, Dordrecht.

OERSTED, Hans Christian (1820): “Experimenta circa effectum Conflictus electrici in Acum magneticam” Schweigger J. Chem. Phys., 19: 275-81.

Please cite as “Faraday2634,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 1 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday2634