John Tyndall to Faraday   19 February 1858

Friday 19th. February 1858.

My dear Mr. Faraday

Will you grant me your patience while I endeavour to lay before you a few reflections which arise out of my recent conversation with you regarding the shortening of my course of lectures1. At the time of our conversation I was so deeply sensible of the kindly feelings which, as you informed me, the Managers had manifested towards me, that I thought of nothing else2. Perhaps I now labour under a misconception, and if so, I am sure that you will have the goodness to set me right.

The matter, as I understand it, stands thus:- I have agreed to perform certain duties, for which the Institution grants me a certain annual salary, and which the Managers have the right to require of me. My friend Dr. Bence Jones is to give his opinion that my health is impaired by these duties, and the Managers, acting on his report, propose to continue my salary at its present amount, while they diminish the quantity of work which I have to perform.

I feel that your own natural disposition enables you to solve mine so thoroughly that I have no fear of your misunderstanding what I have to say upon this proposition. I ask you, therefore, would you not in my place consider that such an arrangement would place you in a doubtful position as regards the Institution? The acceptance of the change, under the proposed conditions, would, I fear, materially hamper a feeling of independence which, throughout my life, I have endeavoured to maintain. If an alteration is to be made at all I certainly should not like to see it made on the grounds of my being unable to discharge the duties which the Managers regard as merely a reasonable return for the terms which they grant me.

Will you in your kindness permit me to draw your attention to the exact circumstances connected with my joining the Institution? I had three offers before me at the time3. The R.I. offered me £200 a year for 19 lectures. Another institution would have given me the same sum4, an assistant, a laboratory and funds for experiments, for 6 lectures annually; and I was afterwards given to understand that this offer would be made still better.- At the conclusion of one of my first lectures at the R.I. a gentleman connected officially with a Government establishment, who had heard of my probable appointment at the R.I. took me aside and advised me strongly not to accept the professorship, telling me that I should regret it if I did, for another and a better post was open to me.

Subsequent to this, as you are aware, the late Sir Henry DelaBeche5 sought to induce me to accept an appointment in the Government School of Mines6. Before me lies a letter from poor Edward Forbes7, in which he communicated to me the strong desire of himself and his colleagues to have me among them8. There was nothing in my agreement with the R.I. to prevent me from holding this post in connexion with my professorship, but the fear that such a connexion might interfere with my duties at the Royal Institution caused me to refuse a position which, in many respects, would have been extremely agreeable to me.

This however occurred subsequent to my appointment at the R.I. and therefore could not influence my decision when the professorship of physics was offered to me. I might refer to other cases which occurred still later - to offers from Woolwich9 and elsewhere, one of which referred to a position, not however in England, worth £600 a year10. I refer to these instances on account of their bearing up on a passage of a letter which I shall cite presently, and to show that since I came to the Institution I have exhibited no disposition to be unfaithful towards it.

But when I made my choice in 1853 the two offers first mentioned were before me, and side by side with these was the offer from the Royal Institution. A short time before the official communication reached me I received a letter from which I extract as follows:- “Mr. Faraday proposed you as Professor of Physics, to receive £200 a year and to give 19 lectures. To show what we might, and ought to do, he read a statement of what the Managers had done for Davy, and he said he saw no reason why we should not do the same now. Davy had £100 and rooms the first year, the second year £200; the third £300; the fourth £400; the fifth an extra hundred for an excursion; the sixth it was repeated, and he was allowed to take a travelling assistant and have his expenses paid; the seventh he had a multitude of other appointments. ….. I have no doubt that a scale sliding upwards will be the result, and you will be allowed any sum however great, for experiments.”11

On Thursday the 26th. of May 1853 a letter reached me from which I will make one or two extracts:- “The Managers met to day, and I am requested to communicate to you officially, that in consequence of a recommendation from Prof. Faraday the Managers are desirous of proposing you for election as Professor of Natural philosophy, with £200 a year.” …. “The £200 may and will be increased in a year, and there is no reason why after a time you should not have £400 (or more) if you devote yourself to the R.I. - Davy had, and Mr. Faraday has quoted him as a precedent for this proceeding. We had a very full meeting, and all were for you, and some for offering you more at first, while all agreed that it was very poor pay.”12

These are the inducements which I had to weigh against the two other offers to which I have referred. I accepted the professorship at the R.I., but I think it will be granted that some discrepancy exists between the above extracts and my actual position after the lapse of nearly five years. I confess that this has often been a source of dissatisfaction to me.- Dissatisfaction perhaps as much with myself as with others. For had I not reason to infer that I had not come up to the Managers’ expectations regarding me, and that the discrepancy to which I have referred was to be attributed, in part at least, to failure of my own?

I have been repeatedly urged by two or three friends who are acquainted with the above circumstances to bring them under the notice of the Managers. But my repugnance to such a step has been hitherto insurmountable. Urged by a friend, I wrote a letter upon the subject last autumn; but when finished I put is aside, and it has lain in my drawer ever since. At present, however, I think perfect frankness on my part is better than remaining silent as I have hitherto done.

Thus far I have looked at my connexion with the R.I. from a commercial point of view merely. Need I say that from first to last this is the consideration which has had least influence with me. The extracts which I have quoted indicated a feeling towards me which I regarded as a thousand times more precious than any pecuniary emolument that the Royal Institution could bestow. This was my feeling at the time, as my letters if consulted, would shew. It is my feeling now. The Institution has surrounded me with relations which to me are above all price. Indeed my feelings towards the Institution are such as would induce me, were I sufficiently independent, to give it my best services without any pecuniary return whatever; for no return of the kind which it could make is to be put in comparison with the happiness which I have derived from the personal relationships, for which I have to thank my connexion with the Institution.

If I were permitted to give utterance to my feelings on the point in question I would express the hope that should the Managers legislate upon the subject, they will not suffer themselves to be influenced in any degree by considerations regarding my health; but be simply guided by what they consider to be just towards me and advantageous to the Institution and to science. Were I relieved to some extent from lecturing I should not become an idler. Other, and perhaps higher work, would be before me. This, and not my health, is with me the point of chief importance, but as things stand at present I find my power of following up such work far more limited than I could wish it to be. This is the point of view from which I should like the question to be regarded. For my health I have no fears, for it is always in my power to repair its injuries by giving myself rest, and I know the reliance which I can place upon a constitution naturally tough and unshaken by physical intemperance.

Believe me dear Mr. Faraday | Ever yours most faithfully | John Tyndall


Endorsed: To be opened when Mr. Faraday has abundance of leisure, but not before.

Address: Professor Faraday.

See letter 3272 and Tyndall, Diary,19 February 1858, 7: 273-5.
See RI MM, 1 March 1858, 11: 220 where it was agreed that Tyndall should deliver no more than twelve lectures each year.
See Eve and Creasey (1945), 44-5.
This was the London Institution. See Tyndall, Diary,20 February 1853, 5: 194-5.
Henry Thomas De La Beche (1796-1855, ODNB). Director of the Geological Survey from 1835.
See Eve and Creasey (1945), 45.
Edward Forbes (1815-1854, ODNB). Palaeontologist at the Geological Survey.
Forbes to Tyndall, 27 December 1853, RI MS JT/1/F/25.
Tyndall, Diary,23 November 1854, 5: 391.
At Toronto. Tyndall, Diary,26 April 1855, 6a: 46-52.
Bence Jones to Tyndall, 9 May 1853, RI MS JT/1/J/50.
Bence Jones to Tyndall, 23 May 1853, RI MS JT/1/J/51. See RI MM, 23 May 1853, 11: 13-14.

Please cite as “Faraday3397,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 30 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday3397