Faraday to Henry Fitzroy   1 July 1859

Hampton Court Green, 1 July 1859.

Sir,

I had the opportunity yesterday of seeing Mr. Szerelmey, who communicated to me, in confidence, his process, with a slight reservation. I find nothing in his mode of procedure which is objectionable or otherwise than good, or which, upon principle, cause me to doubt the success of his process when properly applied1. I may say the same also of other processes, founded by other persons upon the application of alkaline silicates.

Such being the case, we then turn to the results of observations, trial, and experience, without which no method can be judged of or finally approved. The trials at the Houses of Parliament have extended to periods of two or three years2. That the stone of the building requires protection upon the external and weather faces is very manifest; nor can that surprise us when the condition of the London atmosphere, especially in relation to the sulphur acids derived from the coal, and the calcareous nature of the stone, are considered. In my opinion, the results of the trials (and I may say large experiments) made by Mr. Szerelmey are better than any of the rest; and, so far as one can form a judgment upon the experience of two years, justify the expectation that the process will sustain its character for a lengthened period of time. I think it necessary to say that a process, good in principle, may fail if carried carelessly into practice. Mr. Szerelmey’s process has had the advantage of being carried out under the guidance and inspection of himself, the person most fitted for that purpose, and most interested in its success.

I am, &c. | (signed) M. Faraday

The Right Hon. H. FitzRoy, M.P.

This is the first reference with Faraday’s involvement in the problems caused by the decay of the stone of the relatively new Houses of Parliament on which he was asked to comment. His correspondence on the subject was published as a report in Parliamentary Papers. However, the problems continued and the result was a major inquiry during early 1861 in which Faraday played no role. The report of the enquiry is in Parliamentary Papers, 1861 (504) XXXV.
Since the Spring of 1857 Szerelmey had been coating the stone to try and prevent its further deterioration. See the report on the decay of stone, Parliamentary Papers, 1861 (504) XXXV, question 1.

Please cite as “Faraday3610,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday3610