R Institution | June 17.
Sir
I have not time to go into your objection to the atomic theory[.] It would require a view of what we know of chemical affinity but you will find the difficulty referred to in most accounts of the atomic theory especially in the earlier accounts[.]
I do not myself adopt the term atomic theory or atom[.] I do not know what an atom is. The theory of definite proportionals seems to me consistent and being the expression of a multitude of facts is as relates to those facts quite true[.] Whether it be or be not universal is of little consequence to the multitude of useful cases in which it does apply[.]
The hypothetical views which under the term atomic theory have been founded on the theory of definite proportionals I have always held as of very suspicious character[.]
I am sir | Your obedient Servant | M. Faraday
H. Hopwood Esqr
Please cite as “Faraday4678u,” in Ɛpsilon: The Michael Faraday Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/faraday/letters/Faraday4678u