From John Conwill   October 5th 1841.

October 5th 1841.

‘Had I a poet’s, painter’s skill

Or a strong creative will

I’d write in polished lays

Of Tyndall and of old Kinsale

Of Leighlin’s sons and Donerale1

Well known in modern days.’

‘My dear Tyndall’

I have once more scared away the king of terrors2 after having laboured hard during fourteen or fifteen day’s severe illness. As I am very incapable of writing a long letter I must now turn my thoughts another way and send you something on grammar and a few selections from two letters written by Tony O’Neill’s son3 on the Repeal of the Union.4 You may judge for yourself on the grammatical acumen displayed by the classical dolt of Ln.5 On grammar – ‘While over all hangs the rich purple eve’, ‘As conscious of its being her last farewell’,6 – In what case is ‘farewell’ in this sentence?7

So sung

‘The glorious train ascending: he through heaven,

That opened wide her blazing portals, led

To God’s eternal house direct the way.’8

What does ‘led’ govern in this and on what does ‘way’ depend?

‘The free fair homes of England!

Long, long in hut and hall

May hearts of native proof be rear’d

To guard each hallow’d wall.’9

In what case are fair homes & <word(s) missing>. Now to O’Neill’s letter10 – ‘On reading a few days back &c’ ‘But for an Irishman, for a Catholic, too, to endure and support such principles, would be to cast an indelible stigma upon the most grateful, the most generous, and most desirous, too, of Ireland’s future bliss’. Mind this: ‘The writer asks what would be justice to Ireland. Fellow-countrymen mind the answer which it gives – shudder at the thoughts of it. Ponder it, tell it to your &c, and when you have it instilled &c, teach them to remember it.’

‘To be silent on the present most important period that has ever been read in the annals of Irish History, and to regret little which has been long and often ardently sought by Ireland’s sons, to be imprinted on the Irish character, & having now fixed that distinguishing mark upon every true Irish man’s heart, let its indelible stamp pass on to the future men of Ireland.’ ‘To refuse to give utterance to the throes which swell my heart when I touch at all the subject of repeal, would be to choke the thrill which pervades the veins and hearts of the Irish people.’ Here is young O’Neill of classic notoriety for you!

It appears I made a mistake in defending Paul11 – however it may be corrected thus:– Assume any abc erect gh gd and to join dh construct the [yId] having Iy e dh & [yId] supplement of half the cmb; the cbm being the supplement of the assumed abc,12 I presume to day that this will satisfy you as to Paul’s defence.

Not being able to write more | I remain your ever sincere teacher | J. Conwill

RI MS JT/1/11/3522

LT Transcript Only

Donerale: Doneraile, a town in the north of County Cork.

the king of terrors: a synonym for death in Job 18:14.

Tony O’Neill’s son: The name ‘Tony O’Neill’ is probably incorrect since in letter 0101, the author is named as the son of Terence O’Neill, the proprietor of the Swan Inn, Leighlin Bridge. The son’s name is not known.

Repeal of the Union: see letter 0051, n. 9.

the dolt of Ln: the son of Tony/Terence O’Neill; Ln is abbreviation for Leighlin.

While over … last farewell: Neither of these statements is a true sentence. The initial words ‘While’ and ‘As’ normally function as conjunctions in a subordinate clause but here no main clause exists.

In what case is ‘farewell’ in this sentence?: Although the word ‘farewell’ functions as the complement of the subject ‘its’, the addition of the word ‘of’ raises the possibility that the whole participle clause might be considered to be in the genitive case.

So sung … the way: J. Milton, Paradise Lost (1667), VII.573–6.

The free fair homes … hallow’d wall: F. Hemans, ‘The Homes of England’ (1828), 25–8.

O’Neill’s letter: not identified.

a mistake in defending Paul: see letter 0087.

Assume any … assumed abc: LT’s typescript does not permit a viable reconstruction of Conwill’s geometrical argument. Cf. text of letter 0087.

Please cite as “Tyndall0098,” in Ɛpsilon: The John Tyndall Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/tyndall/letters/Tyndall0098