To Thomas Archer Hirst   Saturday night May 17th 18511

Saturday night May 17th 1851.

My Dear Tom

It is 11 oC and I ought to be going to bed instead of sitting down to write to you – well another week has closed down upon my Berlin life – I have been a pretty good boy this week, did not sleep very long in the morning and have stuck steadfast to my work until 7 and 8 in the evening – then home and busied myself with a report for the Phil. Mag.2 I find Tom that hard work resembles teetotalism – it is easier for a drinker to abstain altogether than to half abstain – and the more I work the easier and pleasanter I find my work – at the tag end of a day for example during which I have worked well I find it easier to work an hour longer than at the tag end of a day in which I have worked ill – it puts one in mind of the parable of the 10 talents – ‘To him that hath to him shall be given, and from him that hath not from him shall be taken even that which he hath’3 – I dont know whether you will understand me still I wont bother myself with further explanation – last tuesday eveng I came home at 7½ full of a project for a nights employment – I found an invitation from Prof. Mitscherlich before me – I was in no humour to accept, still he is a great man and I hesitated – I sat down finally and wrote a note declining the invitation4 – I had no seal or my sealing wax was astray – I sent the note to my hostesses daughter begging of her to seal it for me. She stuck a wafer under it I have since learned and I doubt not stamped it with her thimble – thus the document reached the Hofrath5 and formed likely a subject of speculation for him his wife and daughters – I felt annoyed, for I am sensitive on all these points – I would avoid above many things the imputation of being vulgar, it is a feeling which I remember existed strong in me when a boy, next day I felt in duty bound to pay the professor a visit – but why am I ranting thus? why merely to give you [another] one of those phases of character upon which you like to ponder – I know that you can see through the cobweb of an apparently trivial incident and detect the meaning beneath it – Well I disliked the idea of going in very much – but I felt that I ought to do so – At length I said to myself why do you suffer this feeling of annoyance to take hold of you, why do you shirk like a coward a task which you know to be your duty? – why not go forward and prove by the independence of your presence that you are not a vulgar man – My feeling [thus] reasoning became a kind of subdued counterpart to that of Teufelsdrock in the Rue de l’Enfer6 – I felt eased in a moment from my annoyance and cried pshaw! at my previous cowardice – It was all myself – the thing assumed an importance merely because I permitted it to assume it, and the importance vanished the moment I was lord of myself. Rock crystal I believe Tom has surfaces of different texture. some are attacked by acid. others not – a man seems to be a kind of Rock crystal and he has surfaces which if he turns against the canker of the world the tooth of the latter will shew its blunt edge and base temper. Good – I have now done.

Thank you for your letter7 – it was a sweet and precious one to me. of course boy the world’s a school for the individual – but hang me if you draw me just now into your philosophic meshes – I cant afford it – and my eyesight in this direction is too dim just now to interest you with its revelations – still I cannot drive away that idea of the human race being an integral whole in the carrying forward of which the individual has perfect freedom within a certain circuit – the amplitude to which he can swing being never sufficient to disturb the higher designs which have respect to the race – Faraday says to me – ‘nothing is so good as an experiment which whilst it sets an error right &c.’8 Cui bono? I exclaim – what good? Is it this paltry result that you dignify thus? – By heaven if it be to transact tricks of this kind that man is placed here life is not worth living for. Then creeps in that soothing whisper – ‘Know my son that thou art a link on which higher destinies hang. Know that thou in the faithful discharge of thy duty to day art forwarding the ulterior designs of the author of the universe – thou throbbest with his life and thy life must be given for the throb’9 but I’m roaming again –

Your remarks on January10 are just – I liked the article well though it revealed to me nothing which I did not already know – but there is a certain satisfaction in finding that January understands the matter so well. there is sometimes a looseness in his phraseology which I accustomed as I am to strict ‘induction’ would rather see banished – still I fully suscribe to those utterances of his which are apparently most illogical – January has had a very rich experience richer than most men, [so] it will be a pity if he now suffers himself through lazy inanity to become a castaway from nature.

The rust of intellect you say is about that article of mine11 – now whether is the ‘rust’ my rust or your rust – it is a matter of contact so to speak – if the rust be in you it is practically all the same and your judgment has simply referred it to the wrong surface – I tell you boy I’m a very affectionate fellow and no ‘old weasel’12 – I’m sure I could love like a brick if occasion offered.

In a month I shall be leaving Berlin – Shortly afterwards I shall see Dickson personally – write me an account of your symptoms13 in the mean time –

A few days ago I received a most kind letter from Francis14 – he is one of the best fellows I know – He has obtained for me the office of Berlin correspondent to the literary Gazette15 – to send articles and write Reviews at 10/6 a column – I wont undertake it for I cant – no time to spare – He has also proposed to Van Voorst the publisher16 that I should write a treatise on physics for him, and the latter seems to like the idea – He is to see me in Ipswich17 on the subject. I dont know whether I will undertake it – it costs so much time – He has sent copies of my memoir18 to Wheatstone. Sabine and many others – on the whole his bearing towards me is most good natured.

I ask your pardon for this rigmarole – no I dont! – I forgot you and dropped into a silly conventionality. It is now midnight – good luck to you Tom. May your sleep be sound to night and – oh that my prayer could affect those bowels! I would wrestle with all heaven for the blessing19 – Kind love to some of the ladies of the Kränzchen20 – you may make the selection yourself –

Tyndall

RI MS JT/1/T/540

17[-?] May 1851: Tyndall started this letter late on 17 May, but it is a long letter and he enclosed it with letter 0485 of 23 May (see letter 0485, n. 2). All this suggests that he wrote it over a number of days.

a report for the Phil. Mag.: probably Tyndall, ‘Reports on the Progress of the Physical Sciences’, Phil. Mag., 2:8 (July 1851), pp. 26–36, which Tyndall sent to Francis before the end of May (compare letter 0491). It discussed Dove, ‘The Reversion-prism, and its application as ocular to the Terrestrial or Day-Telescope’ and ‘Description of several Prism-stereoscopes, and of a simple Mirror-stereoscope’; and Knoblauch, ‘On the deportment of Crystalline bodies between the electric poles’.

Parable of the 10 talents … he hath’: there are very similar accounts in Matthew, Mark and Luke about a master rewarding his servants in proportion to their success, and taking from the failed one to give to the most successful. The Matthew 25:14-30 version is most frequently identified as the parable of the talents, but Tyndall’s quote is much closer to Mark and Luke. ‘For he that hath, to him shall be given: and he that hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he hath’ (Mark 4:25). ‘That to every one that hath shall be given, and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him’ (Luke 19:26).

wrote a note declining the invitation: letter 0483. Tyndall received a second invitation from Mitscherlich on Wednesday 28 May and on that occasion accepted it (Journal, JT/2/13b/544).

Hofrath: (Hofrat in modern German) a court councillor or senior government official.

Teufelsdrock in the Rue de l’Enfer: an allusion to Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus (1836), Book II, chap. VII. Carlyle’s protagonist, Diogenes Teufelsdröckh experienced an epiphany on the Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer in Paris and refused to be defeated: ‘Thus had the Everlasting No … pealed authoritatively through all the recesses of my Being, of my Me; and then was it that my whole Me stood up, in native God-created majesty, and recorded its Protest…. It is from this hour that I incline to date my spiritual new-birth, or Baphometic Fire-baptism; perhaps I directly thereupon began to be a man’.

your letter: letter 0482.

‘nothing is … right &c.’: Tyndall quotes from letter 0477.

‘Know my son … for the throb’: not identified.

Your remarks on January: see letter 0482 for the discussion of January Searle and his article.

that article of mine: ‘The Forester’s Grave’, which Hirst criticised in his previous letter (0482).

‘old weasel’: Hirst had called the author of ‘The Forester’s Grave’ a ‘Weasel’ in letter 0482.

your symptoms: Tyndall was encouraging him to consult Dr Dickson over his bowel problems.

a most kind letter: letter missing (see letter 0483, n. 2).

Literary Gazette: see letter 0501 where Tyndall alludes to doing work for the Literary Gazette.

Van Voorst the publisher: John Van Voorst (1804–98) was a London publisher who specialized in natural history books.

in Ipswich: Tyndall planned to attend the BAAS meeting in Ipswich in July 1851.

my memoir: the memoir on magnetism (cited letter 0464, n. 2).

I would wrestle … the blessing: Tyndall alludes to Jacob wrestling an angel (or God) and refusing to give up until he had received a blessing (Genesis 32: 24–30).

the Kränzchen: see letter 0482, n. 6.

Please cite as “Tyndall0484,” in Ɛpsilon: The John Tyndall Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/tyndall/letters/Tyndall0484