Ɛpsilon

To George Gabriel Stokes1, 2

My dear Sir,

I return Mr. Matthiessen’s3 paper*4; and am of opinion that it is worthy of being published in the Philosophical Transactions.

Yours very faithfully | John Tyndall

* I presume this should be Messrs. Matthiessen & Vogt? GS5

1863 | Matthiessen | & Vogt | by Tyndall

RS RR/5/144 Tyndall undated 1863

1

[George Gabriel Stokes]: the recipient is given based on content. Tyndall had first communicated to Stokes about the paper referred to here in letter 2050.

2

[December]: the month is given as this 1863 letter follows letter 2050 to Stokes, dated 7 December.

3

Matthiessen: see letter 2050, n. 1.

4

Mr. Matthiessen’s paper: see letter 2050, n. 1.

5

I presume this should be: this note was added in a different hand, signed ‘GS’, presumably George Gabriel Stokes.

Please cite as “Tyndall2059,” in Ɛpsilon: The John Tyndall Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/tyndall/letters/Tyndall2059