To George Bentham1    11 June 1865

11/6/65.

 

Dear Mr Bentham.

The two Rubiaceae sent to you by this mail are evidently as genera new to Australia and possibly new to science. I have not carefully examined them and also not described them, in as much as you have much better material to judge about their position than I have & therefore will be best able to pass an opinion them when you enumerate the Australian. The ripe fruit of both genera is as yet unknown. I have this day sent off to Kew box No. 26 bringing supplemental collections for your use while writing the 3 vol. of the Australian Flora.2 The box is sent by the Sussex and the freight as on all former occasions paid. I should feel obliged by your giving instructions that the freight is paid in London when the collections come back, for the last 5 or 6 boxes have in freight been charged to me both ways!

The draft of £100 for vol. 3 goes by this mail, as I have learnt from the Minister of finance.3

I write more fully to Sir Will. Hooker4

Regardfully

yr

Ferd Mueller

Rubiaceae

The letter has the printed and embossed letterhead: Ladies' Leichardt ( sic ) Search Committee. Bentham has annotated the letter: Dichostachys = Antirhea | Woollsia = Lasianthus very near L [obscurus] | Mephitidia

There is another annotation below Bentham's, apparently added later : [ ] . arrived. The illegible part appears to be an abbreviation.

Bentham (1863-78).
The beginning of this sentence is marked in the margin with a cross. See G. Bentham to M, 21 September 1865.
M to W. Hooker, 9 June 1965 (in this edition as 65-06-09a).

Please cite as “FVM-65-06-11,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/65-06-11