Christmas 1866.
I am glad, dear Mr Bentham, to learn that the Yorkshire arrived & thus hope my plants will have reached you in time.1 I am engaged preparing Goodeniaceae & Epacrideae as a first sending for vol IV & they will be despatched by one of the first clippers now. Some delay has arisen through the enormous work for the exhibition & through the necessity of inserting the Drummondian plants into the Monopetaleae before I forward them.2
Cryptostemma calendulaceum has of late unfortunately also made its appearance in N. S. Wales.3
I have now every new plant nearly mentioned in vol II & I from Cape York & many others, which I am just about to describe. 4 new Cordylines, 1 Tetracera different from the one described,4 &c.
I do not look upon a genus as necessarely a group of species & therefore do not object to genera formed of one species only, as long as the genus has clear marks. My opinion is, that a fair equal amount of characters should attached to each genus, whether mono- or poly-typic. In large genera (Senecio & Aster for instance) sections do best.
You will find my Monopetaleae well marked up in most cases & the species since R BR's time doubled. I presume the completion of the Compositae for genera plantarum5 will absorb your time yet for months
Your regardful
Ferd Mueller
Aster
Compositae
Cordyline
Cryptostemma calendulaceum
Epacrideae
Goodeniaceae
Monopetaleae
Senecio
Tetracera
Please cite as “FVM-66-12-25,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/66-12-25