10/7/70.
I have again written my views on that portion of the work, dear Mr Bentham, which you forwarded to me by the mail just arrived. I am pleased with the whole arrangement and the details, altho' I do not admit quite so many species as you defined. The array of Salsolaceae must surprise naturalists, & I really think we will have yet to add to them, so that probably Australia will turn out one of the richest countries in this respect. For upholding my authorships I remain gratefully indebted to you in many cases.1
This month I have to work for the Sydney Industrial Exhibition and next month I will have to do much for the industrial Museum, to form the phytologic section there, I have also promised at least 2 lectures,2 which together with geographical work and some medical engagements take some time3
But after that I hope to be able to proceed with the Monocotyledoneae vigorously. Much is done towards Restiaceae & other Glumaceae, but the notes want finishing off.
I was glad to learn that your fete at the L.S. was one of great eclat.4
Let me hope you are well.
With this wish concludes
Your attached
Ferd. von Mueller.
All the lithograms were sent successively to Kew, whenever they appeared. But I send now a complete set once more of all those, which have been issued since the 2 vol. was bound up.5
Baillon in his recent histoire des Proteacées has adopted all my Genera but omitted Strangea.6 It seems to me now likely that Buckinghamia as Grevillea Buckinghamii ought to be placed among the true Grevilleas7
Buckinghamia
Glumaceae
Grevillea Buckinghamii
Monocotyledoneae
Restiaceae
Salsolaceae
Strangea
Please cite as “FVM-70-07-10a,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 26 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/70-07-10a