Melbourne
bot Garden
19/[5]/7[2]1
I am always delighted, dear Mr Bentham, to see your handwriting and to read your kind and instructive letters. Let me thank you for all your sympathy.There is a reaction in my favor, and I have a fair prospect of surmounting all my difficulties. It is through an individual, and a very low one too, in the employ now of the Argus (Mr Edw Wilson's and Mr M'Kinnon's paper) that my miseries and the desorganisation of my Department have been mainly brought about. The necessity of defending my Directorship has thrown almost all scientific work of mine during the last 18 month in the background.
A lot of Supplemental Euphorbiaceae ought to go to you within the next few months, so also other supplemental Monochlamydeae. I must then be guided by your wishes in further sendings, but expect that you need Orchideae first after that, unless - to keep Dicotyledoneae together - you prefer to supplement Thalamiflorae &c in the volume, at least as far as new species are concerned.
It is perfectly edifying to hear you speak of finishing the Compositae for the genera.2 What a treasure of information for all time that will be! The genera are far more important then the Austr. flora. Your new arrangement seems to simplify the distribution of Compositae in tribes & subtribes much.
Always yours
with deep reverence
Ferd. von Mueller
Compositae
Euphorbiaceae
Monochlamydeae
Orchideae
Thalamiflorae
Please cite as “FVM-72-05-19,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/72-05-19