July 6. 1874.
Brisbane
Dear Baron
I have to thank you for a number of the Fragmenta, & for a resumé of [Marches] usuelles1. Further I want your assistance with the Enclosed well marked plant, brought to me as you see it, in a dried state, and which I cannot satisfy myself about.2
I have only just seen the sixth vol. of the Fl. Australiensis: as to the irritability of Arthrochilus, a better if later name than Drakaea, I can only say I have tried many of the flowers, & can detect very little or no true irritability, though the [bruneus]3 colour is usually accompanied by it, notably in Caleana, & in the labellum of Pterostylis acuminata.
Caladenia caerulea is a common sps about Brisbane, but not noticed as a Queensland plant.
Arethusa [virginea]4 in its early winter form, is both in locality and appearance different enough from our Common C. carnea.
Is there a specific difference between Polypodium urophyllum, and your Goniopt. Kennedyii?5 the former or what I have been accustomed to call such I found in a single locality near Brisbane long since; the latter I only Remember from a fragment brought me by Mr Bailey which I cannot now find. I should like mightily to have a week's inspection of your Melbourne herbarium.
I have lately seen a few ferns collected by Dallachy, & given by him to an amateur; northern ferns, all common species, except perhaps your unluckily named Alsoph. Rebeccae,6 and since renamed;7 yet he seems to have been a most successful collector.
Believe me, dear Baron
very Sincerely Yours
Chas . Prentice.
Alsophila Rebeccae
Arethusa virginea
Arthrochilus
Caladenia caerulea
Caladenia carnea
Caleana
Drakaea
Goniopteris Kennedyii
Polypodium urophyllum
Pterostylis acuminata
usual matters?
Note pinned to MS: 'Brought to me from Moreton island' [Qld].
brunneus?
Neither Arethusa virginea, nor a less likely reading as A. virginica, has been found (APNI, IPNI accessed 28 June 2023)
Goniopteris kennedyi?
Alsophila Rebeccae.
Named by M in B65.07.03, reputedly to honour Rebecca Nordt (Maroske (1997)). No use of a different name before 1929 has been found (APNI, accessed 23 June 2023); it is recognised as a good species in Bentham 1863-78), vol. 7 (1878) p. 710, and is listed in B89.12.03.
MS annotation by M: 'Answ 28/7/74'. Letter not found.
Please cite as “FVM-74-07-06,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on