Drouin,1 22/2/84
This day, dear Mr Dyer, I received your note conveying the wish of reobtaining a living plant of Ophioglossum pendulum. At once I rendered your desire known to Mr Pink,2 who is almost sure to have a Platycerium to spare with an Ophioglossum growing on it; perhaps there may even yet specimens of spontaneous growth yet occur near the Brisbane-River.3 I have begged of him to send the plant to Kew direct.4
For the print on sand binding plants I feel much obliged.5 All such publications are useful for supplementing the “Select plants” though I rigorously must exclude any species, which is not practically valuable on a commercial scale and not readily manageable. I pick up new data, thus restrained, whenever and wherever I can. The Detroit-Edition, according to letters by the last American mail, was then nearly got through the press.6 A presentation copy will go to Kew. Will you kindly ask Sir Joseph, whether I ought to include among fruit-plants the Decaisnea just illustrated in the Bot Mag in the next Edition?7
Asa Gray just sent me his printed remarks on A. De C.’s last legislative essay.8 He puts the case of Candollea and Stylidium incompletely, omitting that the former Candollea got absorbed in Hibbertia. Then, where is fixity without proper priority; such would be contradictory.9
The summer-heat alleviated my pulmonary sufferings. I have just gone with Office-work to a forest-region of Gippsland; there is now some hope of my ultimately recovering.
Regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller
Hibbertia
Candollea
Stylidium
Decaisnea
Platycerium
Ophioglossum pendulum
Please cite as “FVM-84-02-22,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 26 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/84-02-22