28/4/85
Let me thank you, dear Mr Dyer, for sending me the Kew-Report for 1882,1 the Museum-Guide2 and Mess. Bower & Vines practical Botany,3 all of value here in a variety of ways.4 I am obliged also for the specimen of Myoporum brevipes for my Monography.5
The complete morphology and history of the development of Phylloglossum should be very interesting, considering the odd position, which that genus occupies between Lycopodiaceae and Ophioglosseae. I cannnot however befriend myself with the idea of Coniferae and Cycadeae being placed near Lycopodiaceae, notwithstanding the gigantic fossil forms of the latter. Coniferae and Cycadeae are so truely dicotyledoneous as they could possibly be; and when we come to the gnetaceous forms and even Welwitchia, which Sir Joseph so brilliantly illustrated, we see that they ought to be kept with other Dicotyledon[e]s and have only external resemblances to spore-bearing plants. I look on them neither as having absolutely naked ovules; and traces of a stigmatic apparatus may be found even among the Cupressinae, e.g. Fitzroya.6
Regardfully your
Ferd. von Mueller
I can send more Phylloglosum tubers, should you not succeed in growing the lot forwarded.
Coniferae
Cupressinae
Cycadeae
Fitzroya
Lycopodiaceae
Myoporum brevipes
Ophioglosseae
Phylloglossum
Welwitchia
Please cite as “FVM-85-04-28a,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 19 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/85-04-28a