From Frederick Bailey   11 October 1885

October 11 1885

Dear Baron Mueller

I have received slightly better specimens of the Johnstone River1 "Hardwood" and from these I am fully persuaded the tree is not an Eugenia but think it much more likely a Backhousia but its ovules are those of Myrtus I would like to have your opinion of this for although I may receive ripe fruit there is the chance that I may not in time to utilize the wood2 — I may here remark that young Bancroft3 in forwarding what I take for the fruit of those of which he had formerly sent foliage often sends quite a distinct tree he has done this with the Sloanea & others — he seems to trust to memory and not to duplicate specimens however from fruit wrongly sent I have been able to determine some of those I sent to you. I feel so sorry that I troubled you with them — He has sent me what he calls the flowers of that climber bearing the large 3-celled fruit with large globose nuts and of which I sent you the foliage a short time ago prior to which I sent you a good sound fruit the best I had received. I have opened none of the flowers but will send them on to you as you have the best fruit I would like it named after some prominent feature in the plant and to bear our joint authority — I thought the flowers bore some resemblance to Hernandia

Myrtus?4 Bancroftii sp nov

a tall tree with a persistent thin somewhat scaly bark — the wood of an almost equal color greyish-brown very strong & durable known as the Johnstone River "Hardwood" the branchlets Leaves penninerved, opposite, ovate-lanceolate, or those nearest to the inflorescence smaller, and ovate-oblong 2 to 4 in. long 1¼ to nearly 2 in. broad, very obtuse or shortly acuminate, tapering at the base to a 3 lined long petiole midrib and primary veins prominent the latter looping far within the margin.

Inflorescence very slightly pubescent in terminal trichotomous panicles which are often in the upper axils thus having the appearance of large leafy panicles common peduncle slender about 2 in. long bearing 3 to 5 pedicellate flowers at the ends of the branches pedicels slender about 4 lines long — calyx tube broadly turbinate strongly ribbed and slightly pubescent scarcely 2 lines long, lobes 5 unequal broad and rounded, much imbricated with more or less scarious margins marked with prominent veins persistent and enlarging somewhat after flowering. Petals 5 orbicular much crumpled and very deciduous slightly larger than the calyx lobes. Stamens free numerous inserted on a raised prominent ring, inflated in the bud. Ovary broad slightly sunk in the flower, but becoming more or less superior as it advances towards maturity 2-celled with about 6 ovules in each cell, the subulate styles rather long and persistent.

Yours very truly

F M Bailey

 

Ripe fruit? I enclose a few of the more advanced fruits. These are not from Bancroft I have sent you his before — I feel sure you will agree with me that it is not an Eugenia.

I cannot remember sending you any Cupania from Mount Mistake5 could you return a portion of it and I will endeavour to get better specimen for you

 

Backhousia Bancroftii

Cupania

Eugenia

Hernandia

Myrtus

Sloanea

 
Qld.
Bailey was preparing a selection of Qld woods for the 1886 Colonial and Indian Exhibition in London; see Bailey (1886a).
Thomas Bancroft?
Myrtus? crossed through, apparently by M, andBackhousia substituted. Bailey's description, lightly edited, was published as Backhousia bancroftiiin Bailey (1886), p. 24, under the joint authority of Bailey and M.
Qld.

Please cite as “FVM-85-10-11,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora, J.H. Voigt and Monika Wells accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/85-10-11