We here2 are entirely of opinion with Mr. Douglas3 that no credit is to be given to the vague, senseless reports brought in by two savages who have deserted the party, Heaven knows from what real motives. .... As they brought no letters from the explorers, we have a reason to suppose that their departure was a secret amongst them, and unknown to the explorers. From such men, under such circumstances, we are not likely to gain any truth at present. We must only wait until time reveals the true state of the case. . . Meanwhile I see no cause for alarm.4
Letter not found. The text given here is from 'The news of the expedition', Australasian, 14 November 1885, p. 2 S. The report is part of series of articles relating to the New Guinea Expedition mounted by the Australasian Geographical Society, which included rumours, subsequently proved baseless, of a disaster resulting from attacks by tribesmen. The extracts of the letter are introduced by
The local branch of the Geographical Society has received no information concerning the reported disaster, and the president, Baron von Mueller, expresses strong doubt as to the correctness of the information received. He points out that the report is of the vaguest, and most uncircumstantial character, and suggests that it may be a revival of the rumour which was circulated some weeks ago as to the perilous position of the party. Regarding this report Sir Edward Strickland, president of the society, writing to Baron von Mueller, under date Oct. 16, said:
i.e. in Sydney.
John Douglas.
Ellipses in source.
Please cite as “FVM-85-10-16,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on