From Otto Nordstedt to Ferdinand von Mueller   [Oct 1886]

Geehrterster Herr

Professor Baron Fr. v. Müller.

Besten Dank für die erhaltenen Characeen und Algen!

Ich sende hier die Bestimmungen der Characeen.

[Most esteemed Professor Baron Fr. v. Müller.

Best thanks for the Characeae and Algae received!

I am sending here the determinations of the Characeae.]

Clyde-District W Bäuerlen Nov 1884 no 149 = N. Gunnii ß fastigiata A. Br (Coleochaete sp. Cosmarium)

Huon-River Tasmania 1884 Ch. Glover = Nitella diffusa A. Br ♂

(Pleurotaenium. Closterium, Batrachospermum)

Moona-Plains Walcha NS.W. Dec 1884 A.K. Crawford1 358 = Ch. dichopitys α Preissii f. major polyphylla

Moona-River 1884 A. K. Crawford = Nit. Sonderi A Br. (nuculis immaturis; unde determinatio no satis certa)

[(with nucules immature, whence determination not completely certain)]

Richmond river 1884 Mr Hodgkinson, = Chara australis R.Br. α nobilis A Br. ac Vaucheria sessilis (Vauch) DC.

Genoa-District W. Bäuerlen Feb 1885 No 44 = Chara gymnopitys A Br f. polyphylla (Bulbochaete steril!)

[(Bulbochaete sterile!)]

Moonan Brook NSW 1885 Miss Carter = Chara contraria A Br ß Behriana A Br. (fruct. immaturis, unde determinatio non fatis certa)

[(fruit immature, whence determination not completely certain)]

(Oedogonium ac Bulbochaete steril)

[(Oedogonium and Bulbochaete sterile)]

Tamworth NSW. D A. Porter = Spirogyra maxima (Hass.) Wittr.

Napier New Zealand Reader = Nitella Hookeri A Br

Genoa river Bäuerlen 184 = Trentepohlia (=Chroolepus) sp.

Mit grössten Hochachtung und Dankbarkeit

[With greatest respect and gratitude]

ergebenst

[sincerely]

Otto Nordstedt

Bulbochaete

Chara australis α nobilis

Chara contraria ß Behriana

Chara dichopitys α Preissii f. polyphylla

Chara gymnopitys f. polyphylla

Characeae

Chroolepus

Coleochaete

Cosmarium

Nitella diffusa

Nitella Gunnii ß fastigiata

Nitella Hookeri

Nitella Sonderi

Oedogonium

Spirogyra maxima

Trentepohlia

Vaucheria sessilis

Misreading of A. R. Crawford?

MS dated to October 1886 on the assumption that it is a reply to M to O. Nordstedt, 5 August 1886, some specimens being numbered and others not as described in that letter, and October being the earliest date when Nordstedt could have responded. Translations are given, where required, below relevant text. O. See also O. Nordstedt to M, 15 April 1886.

Please cite as “FVM-86-10-00a,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/vonmueller/letters/86-10-00a