6/7/90
Among other work this day, dear Prof. Tate, in the quietness of Sunday, I have looked at some of your plants. You sent a curious Maba from the Adelaide-River,1 which I will carefully compare.
Your Hydrocotyle crassiuscula I regard as a form of H. callicarpa.
The Daviesia is not D. horrida, I think it is a form of D. genistifolia, but I will compare the plant in my Museum, and let you know the result.2
Prof. Beck of Vienna has just elaborated a monography of the genus Orobanche; altho' he separates by a distinct description the Australian plant as a form, yet he does not hold it distinct as a species from O. cernua,3 to which Drummonds plant was referred by Reuter4 already in 1847 I had compared many northern specimens of O. cernua, and saw that ours was not absolutely identical
Sisymbrium procumbens seems a very distinct species.
Stenopelatum5 trisectum I will carefully examine also the Schoenus.
Will give on separate paper replies to your extensive memorandum.6
Let me hope, that you are now quite well again.
Regardfully
your
Ferd von Mueller7
Schoenus sphaerocephalus Shall be entered now in the Census8
Emex australis. I shall, after what you say, consider it as immigrated, though it has become wide spread in W.A.
Cakile maritima better be struck out also.
Schoenus fluitans & Cyperus pygmaeus will now be inserted. In a work of such magnitude as the Census, omissions would readily occur, particularly when I had to push it hurriedly through the press before the work for the Austral. Assoc. came on.9 The Herbarium here has 750,000 sheets; the supplements are not all inserted; hence often the difficulty for reference. I mainly raised these questions to aid you in a future edition of your Flora,10 when likely I shall no longer be among the living!
Adenostemma viscosum
Such a plant would be apt to be over looked among reeds, rushes on river or lake banks. In 1849 it could have hardly immigrated there
Lygodium reticulatum This must be a typographic displacement from some other line. I do not remember having ever seen a Lygodium from extratropic S.A.
Aspidium aculeatum
Near the entrance of the Glenelg River,11 so far as I remember from my hurried ride in 1857.12
Thelymitra rubra. It was a mere writing error, when I compared it to T. Mackibboni;13 it should have been T. Macmillani.
Cardamine hirsuta. From 1840-1846 I saw this and C. silvatica (of which C. flexuosa is an older name) frequently in their growing state; thus I am well aware, that our plant does not exactly coincides with the typical C. hirsuta; but J. Hooker even in the last edition of his Students Flora14 kept them still united as varieties of one species. I was long disinclined to use the name C. hirsuta, and thus adopted in 1860 that of C. parviflora, some specimens of our Australian plants precisely agreeing with C. parviflora. The only difficulty is, that Linnaeus gave a diagnosis of C. hirsuta in the first edition of his Spec. plantarum,15 whereas C. parviflora appeared only 9 years in the second edition.16 Sir J. Hooker went also too far in uniting Geranium pilosum with G. dissectum (of which G. Carolinianum is an older name) and in reducing our Epilobium to E. tetragonum. I know all the European species well from the field, and do no longer follow Hooker in these unisons as you will observe from the second Census. Witherings first edition17 appeared in 1876, Linnés second in 1862.18
Barbarea vulgaris. Will give it for S.A. the benefit of the doubt; here it is not a lowlands plant.
Ricinocarpus pinifolius. The Rev. T. Woods may have mistaken Bertya Mitchelli19 for this.
Spergularia marina I found the characteristics less constant here than in Europe.
Kochia pentatropis Will report on this hereafter. Any how it is too late now for the Atlas of Salsolaceae,20 as nearly 60 plates are printed off
Erysimum Blennodia could not be called E. canescens, because that name was preoccupied elsewhere
Myriophyllum intermedium I have not yet confirmed the union of M. variifolium with this, but will early do
Potamogeton ochreatus I merely recorded this from Mr Bennetts published notes.21 When I arrived 1847 I recognized at once P. obtusifolius, which I knew so well; if ours differs, then I have never yet appreciated the characters properly, notwithstanding my repeated inspection of Raoul's plate.22 What do you think of it? You must know it well from Belfast.23 — I don't remember the name P. laevis, the junior here must have made a clerical error. Will look once more over the mass of Hypoxis here and endeavour to sort them out. I am quite open to a change of opinion.
Cymodocea antarctica; the name involves a geographic question and consideration. Equally misleading was the name Lunaria annua L; it is now universally Lunaria biennis, Mönch. The French call Dicksonia antarctica since many years Cibotium Billardieri
Panic.24 Mitchelli = Sporobolus Lindleyi.
The Stipas need all working over again from the now augmented material
Capsella humistr.25 = C. cochlearina.
Abutilon halophilum!
Poa Fordeana!
The branching grass from the square water holes is new to me, but there remain of the inflorescence only the two outer bracts
Crinum. I feel almost sure, that only two species exist in extratropic S.A. Is not the true C. pedunculatum in culture there? Benthams conception of the species was partly incorrect; this is not to be wondered at, as he worked only with fragmentary material from herbariums. Of course I only gained my own knowledge from experiences in many cases, after the volumes of the Flora26 were published; and when I was aware of what I believed to be correct, I had no means of checking errors, while the printing went on in Europe. Correcting supplements never appeared, altho' I gave Bentham after the issue of each volume heaps of emendatory notes. As an Octogenarian he could not proceed.
Cheiranthera. The test, whether you have one or two species would be particularly in comparing the ripe fruit of both. In India and in Australia we have species of Utricularia, with straight and very tortile stems. Mr Clarke is responsible for the reduction of our to the Indian plant.27 I recorded this, so that the subject might not be lost sight of. If he is correct in his opinion, then it seems strange, that we have M. variifolium28 not in tropical Australia.
Goodenia sepalosa. I merely referred to the specimen from Tietkens. Your specimen from Hermansburg29 may not be the correct one; the play of forms however of some Goodenias, such as G. geniculata, is remarkable.
Senecio hypoleucus It is the analogon of Spiraea Ulmaria var discolor, Koch.
Cassinia or Humea punctulata. I have these two genera on the table, and hope to report soon further on the S.A. species also.
Styphelia elliptica
I purchased Woods plants after his lamented death;30 so perhaps his collections will clear up the doubt
Abutilon halophilum
Adenostemma viscosum
Aspidium aculeatum
Barbarea vulgaris
Bertya Mitchelli
Cakile maritima
Capsella cochlearina
Capsella humistrata
Cardamine flexuosa
Cardamine hirsuta
Cardamine parviflora
Cardamine silvatica
Cassinia punctulata
Cheiranthera
Cibotium Billardieri
Crinum pedunculatum
Cymodocea antarctica
Cyperus pygmaeus
Daviesia genistifolia
Daviesia horrida
Dicksonia antarctica
Emex australis
Epilobium tetragonum
Erysimum Blennodia
Erysimum canescens
Geranium Carolinianum
Geranium dissectum
Geranium pilosum
Goodenia geniculata
Goodenia sepalosa
Humea punctulata
Hydrocotyle callicarpa
Hydrocotyle crassiuscula
Hypoxis
Kochia pentatropis
Lunaria annua
Lunaria biennis
Lygodium reticulatum
Maba
Myriophyllum intermedium
Myriophyllum variifolium
Orobanche cernua
Panicum Mitchelli
Poa Fordeana
Potamogeton laevis
Potamogeton obtusifolius
Potamogeton ochreatus
Ricinocarpus pinifolius
Salsolaceae
Schoenus fluitans
Schoenus sphaerocephalus
Senecio hypoleucus
Sisymbrium procumbens
Spergularia marina
Spiraea Ulmaria var discolor
Sporobolus Lindleyi
Stenopelatum trisectum
Stipa
Styphelia elliptica
Thelymitra Mackibboni
Thelymitra Macmillani
Thelymitra rubra
Utricularia
NT.
M returned the specimen of Daviesia genistifolia to Tate without commenting further on its relationships; see M to R. Tate, 18 August 1890 (in this edition as 90-08-18a).
Beck (1890), p. 144.
Reuter (1847), p. 32.
Stenopetalum?
Memorandum not found.
What follows is probably the 'separate paper' mentioned above, but this is not certain. It is added here as the content relates to the letter. The reference in it to the death of J. T. Woods and the purchase of his herbarium means that it must have been written after M had received this collection, which he agreed to buy in M to G. Abbott, 21 March 1890 (in this edition as 90-03-21a), and M to T. Wilson, 22 March 1890.
B89.12.03.
M was President of the Second Congress of the Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Melbourne in January 1890.
Tate (1890).
Vic.
M paid a brief visit to the Glenelg River region in January 1857 to see his sisters, who were both living in the area, following his return from the North Australian Exploring Expedition, 1855-6.
T. Mackibbinii?
J. Hooker (1884).
Linnaeus (1753).
later omitted? See Linnaeus (1762-3).
Withering (1776).
Error for 1776 and 1762 respectively.
B. mitchellii?
B89.13.04, B90.13.14, B91.13.24.
A. Bennett (1881).
Raoul (1846), pl. 7.
Ireland.
Panicum.
Capsella humistrata.
Bentham (1863-78).
Clarke (1885), deals with Utricularia, but it is not clear to which species M is referring.
Myriophyllum variifolium.
NT.
J. T. Woods died in 1889.
Please cite as “FVM-90-07-06,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on