| 164 | Pultenaea acerosa, RBr |
| 183, | Brachyloma ericoides, Sonder |
| 182, | Senecio magnificus, FvM |
| 181, | Styphelia Sonderi, F.V.M. |
| 179, | Pomaderris racemosa Hooker |
| 178, | Podolepis canescens, Cunningham. |
| 177, | Cassia eremophila, Cunningham |
| 176, | Muehlenbeckia appressa, Meissner. |
| 175, | Templetonia egena, Bentham |
| 174, | Grevillea ilicifolia, RBr. |
| 172, | Logania ovata, R.Br. |
| 171, | Calorophus fastigiatus, F.v.M |
| 170. | Podolepis Lessoni1 Bentham |
| 169, | Calycothrix tetragona Labill. |
| 168, | Eutaxia empetrifolia, Schlecht, |
| 167, | Grevillea ilicifolia, RBr var induta2 |
| 165, | Dillwynia patula, F.v.M Seeds desired, if at any time obtainable |
Brachyloma ericoides
Calorophus fastigiatus
Calycothrix tetragona
Cassia eremophila
Dillwynia patula
Eutaxia empetrifolia
Grevillea ilicifolia
Grevillea ilicifolia var induta
Logania ovata
Muehlenbeckia appresa
Podolepis canescens
Podolepis Lessoni
Pomaderris racemosa
Pultenaea acerosa
Senecio magnificus
Styphelia Sonderi
Templetonia egena
lessonii?
No published variety name induta has been found (APNI, accessed 10 February 2021).
AVH data (accessed 19 February 22022) show that except for nos. 170 and 181 the specimens were all collected in September and October 1890. No. 170 is dated only to the year 1890. No. 181 at MEL is said to have been collected in July and is identified as Stenanthera conostephioides, of which, however, the name given in this list is a synonym, so possibly a data entry error for September. There are other oddities in the data. Four specimens are dated 29 September, three from Minlaton but the other from about 175 km further north. The specimen with the latest date, number 182, is dated 24 October from Mt Brown, and this may seem questionable since the others with precise dates were collected from 23 September to 1 October. It is, however, feasible since Gill is reported as returning from Mt Brown to Adelaide on 25 October (Evening journal (Adelaide), 28 October 1890, p. 2). The list is therefore dated to November as the earliest likely date M could have written it.
Please cite as “FVM-90-11-00g,” in Correspondence of Ferdinand von Mueller, edited by R.W. Home, Thomas A. Darragh, A.M. Lucas, Sara Maroske, D.M. Sinkora†, J.H. Voigt† and Monika Wells accessed on