Batchian [Bacan]1
Nov. 28th. 1858
F. P. Pascoe2 Esq.
My dear Sir
It was with great pleasure I heard from Mr. Stevens3 some time since that you proposed publishing a complete list of my Aru4 longicorns, & it was with much regret I learnt from a subsequent letter that you had abandoned your intention in consequence of Mr. Thompson5 having figured a few of the finest sp[ecies]. in his Archives.6 I really think you sh[oul]d have got the start of him as you had or might have had my private coll[ection]. long before he got his sets. However that may be I trust that on the Arrival of my Dorey insects7 you will again take up the matter & by combining the Aru & Dorey coll[ectio]ns with those of the French & Dutch naturalists give us a complete synopsis of the Longicorns of the New Guinea fauna yet known, — a labour that will redound to your credit & [2] be far more interesting & useful to Entomologists than any quantity of isolated descriptions & figures of even the most magnificent species.
Allow me also to observe (& pray do not take offence at the observation) that you have placed me in the same (or a worse) position as Mr. T. has placed you, — by describing only the finer & more interesting new species from my Malacca & Borneo Longicorns leaving me a mass of minute & obscure species which I shall have the labour of working out & describing myself. This you may imagine is not an agreeable prospect & I therefore told Mr. Stevens to inform you of a rule I had long since made, not to lend any portions of my private coll[ectio]ns except to parties who would work out entire groups from one or more localities. As I look forward to publishing on my return a complete synopsis of the Col[eopter]a of the Archipelago, it is [3] necessary for me to obtain as much previous assistance as possible, — besides wh[ich]. I object altogether on principle to picking out the more interesting & well marked new sp[ecies]. from a collection, for publication. Every one however has a right to his own opinions on this matter & can follow his own course as regards the sp[ecies]. in his own collection. All I require is that my finer unique sp[ecies]. should either be taken with the entire group to which they belong or left to season my own labours on the unsavoury mass of minute obscurities.
In the Dorey coll[ection]. are a good many fine & interesting forms mostly unique or rare. The Tmesisterni are very difficult & I think it is impossible to determine them without comparison with the N[ew]. Guinea specimens in the Paris & Leyden coll[ectio]ns. T[mesisternus] septem punctatus. Bois. I found at Dorey. His fig[ure]. in "Voy[age]. of Astrolabe"8 is wretched & his locality, Amboyna [Ambon]9 (as usual) wrong.
[4]10
My small Amboyna coll[ection]. contains some lovely things & at Gilolo11 & this place I am getting lots of new & pretty species.
I remain | My dear Mr Pascoe | Yours sincerely | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
F. P. Pascoe Esq.12
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP1462.1241)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Envelope used to file letter, addressed to "W. G. Wallace Esq., Old Orchard, Broadstone, Wimborne" with stamp, postmarked "[?] | 8:15PM | JA 26 | 14." A note is written on front of envelope: "Two of ARW's notes to Mr Pascoe | Nov/58. | July/59"; postmark on back. [Envelope (WCP1462.5105)]
Please cite as “WCP1462,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 1 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP1462