WCP180

Letter (WCP180.180)

[1]

Old Orchard —

July 8th. 1903

My dear Will1

I have just finished going over your notes and corrections of last 4 chapters2. I can’t think how I was so stupid to make the mistakes in figures which you corrected. In almost all cases I have made some modification in accordance with your suggestions and the book will be much improved thereby. I have put in a new par [paragraph] about the stars in other parts than the Milky Way & Solar Cluster, — but there is really nothing known about them. I have also cut out the first reference to Jupiter altogether.

Of course a great deal is speculative but any reply to it is equally speculative. The question is, which speculation is most in accordance with the known facts, & not with prepossessions only.

[2] Considering that the book has all been read up, & written in less than 3 months, it cannot be expected to be as complete & careful as if 3 years had been expended on it — but then it is fresher perhaps. The bit about the pure air came to me while writing & I let myself go. Why should I not try & do a little good & make people think a little on such matters, when I have the chance of perhaps more readers than all the other books?

As to my making too much of man, — of course that is the whole subject of the book! And I look at it differently from you, because, I know facts about him you neither know nor believe yet. If you once get convinced of the [3] facts & teachings of Spiritualism, you will think more as I do. As soon as I have read over & finally corrected these 4 chapters I shall send them all to the publishers. Then I have to write a second article a Reply to Criticism3- for the "Fortnightly" — in which I shall also refer to the book & the new matter it contains.

Did you not have a terrific day on Monday? Here it was a north-westerly gale so cold & strong that I could hardly stand out in it. It is not all over yet.

As soon as the new article was arranged for I saw an advertt. of a 2 ½ inch Telescope by Cooke of York — long the first-makers in the kingdom — for £.10. So I had it on approval, & have bought it. It is not very new but in excellent [4] condition, and all parts beautifully finished — Brass tripod stand — 3 ast. [astronomical] eye piece — & a diagonal. also steadying rod. In4a mahog. [mahogany] case with handles easily carried. Altogether I expect better than the one I had before & about half the weight. I am having a strong tripod table made to stand it on in the verandah or garden. I have only tried it once on Longfleet Church — beautiful definition. When you or Violet5 come we will try it on some planets, star cluster &c.

I have been also helping Fred. Birch6 (the young "born naturalist" of Liverpool) to try & get a post as Museum Curator in the Malay Federated States. He got 12 very good testimonials, & we are now anxiously waiting to know the result.

It was advertised for in Nature from the Colonial Office — Salary £240 & house or rooms.

Your affectionate Pa | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]

Wallace, William Greenell (1871-1951). Son of ARW.
Wallace, A. R. 1903. Man's place in the universe; a study of the results of scientific research in relation to the unity or plurality of worlds. London: Chapman & Hall.
Wallace, A. R. 1903. Man's place in the universe: A reply to criticisms. Independent (New York) 55 (no. 2856, 27 August): 2024-2031.
This sentence was written vertically up the left hand margin of page 4.
Wallace, Violet Isabel (1869-1945). Daughter of ARW; teacher.
Birch, Frederick ("Fred") (1876-1952). British naturalist and natural history collector. Honorary Secretary of the Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society.

Published letter (WCP180.6484)

[1] [p. 121]

To MR. W. G. WALLACE

Old Orchard. July 8, 1903.

My dear Will,— I have just finished going over your notes and corrections of the last four chapters. I can’t think how I was so stupid to make the mistake in figures which you corrected. In almost all cases I have made some modification in accordance with your suggestions, and the book will be much improved thereby. I have put in a new paragraph about the stars in other parts than the Milky Way and Solar Cluster, but there is really nothing known about them. I have also cut out the first reference to Jupiter altogether. Of course a great deal is speculative, but any reply to it is equally speculative. The question is, which speculation is most in accordance with the known facts, and not with prepossessions only?

Considering that the book has all been read up and [2] written in less than three months, it cannot be expected to be as complete and careful as if three years had been expended on it, but then it is fresher perhaps. The bit about the pure air came to me while writing, and I let myself go. Why should I not try and do a little good and make people think a little on such matters, when I have the chance of perhaps more readers than all my other books ?

As to my making too much of Man, of course that is the whole subject of the book! And I look at it differently from you, because I know facts about him you neither know nor believe yet. If you are once convinced of the facts and teachings of Spiritualism, you will think more as I do.

Please cite as “WCP180,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP180