[1]1
New Malden
Kingston-on-Thames
S.W.
Nov. 10. 1864
Dear Sir.
Thanks for your treatise.2 The difference between is the mere question of Time; and then[?] only to the following extent. If Geology carries the antiquity of Man beyond a certain point all I do is to criticize the evidence to the best of my power, &, unless I find a flaw in it, take the date it gives. If asked, however, if Ethnology requires an equal antiquity & so [2] strengthens by[?] the inference from Geology, I should say that it did not; the most that could be said being that the two were not incompatible. I suppose you hold that the Ethnological view is positively confirmatory of the Geological.
Ever most truly y[our]s | R G Latham [signature]
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP2075.1965)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2075,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 20 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2075