Edinburgh
21st March 1870
Dear Sir, —
An attack of an old complaint, pain in the head, has prevented me from being able to answer your letter1 till today.
On looking over my stock I find that all my separate copies of the paper on Geol[ogical]. Time2 are gone with the exception of one or two copies of the last part.
I read your able article [2] on Geol[ogical]. Time in "Nature" with great pleasure and interest[.]3
With the exception of a small point of little or no importance whatever, which you will find alluded to in the last page of a paper on Ocean Currents which was written some months ago,4 I agree with you out and out on all the points.
I feel satisfied that your estimate of the age of our stratified formations is much nearer the truth then the one I gave in my paper on Geol[ogical]. Time.
Thanks for the very complimentary way in which you speak [3] of my labours in your article.
I have just read a letter by Mr. Dawkins5 in Nature on your article.6 He seems to have got into the mud in regard to real pith of your argument.
I am, Dear Sir | Yours very truly | James Croll [signature]
Alfred R. Wallace, Esq
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP2241.2131)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2241,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 20 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2241