7, North Bank,1
N.W.
March 21st 1873
____________________
My Dear Wallace
You and Mrs Wallace have been in my thoughts [1 word illeg.] daffodils &c which I want you to see but how[?] [to] manage it this weather?
As to Batrachians2 I will say all I can now as I am not likely soon to bring anything out about them. Ophiomorpha containing only a few genera one need say nothing about.
As to the Urodela I would not take Gray's3 arrangement4 in their case any more than in any other — He makes sad confusion & gives endless trouble to those who work after him.
[2] The primary subdivisions of the Urodela used to be easy enough when one[?] thought permanent gills an important character but now the Axol[o]tl has upset that & it seems to be not improbable that Menobranchus may only be a persistant larva of some lost Spelerpes [.]
What then are we to think of Proteus & Siren ?
Still as this is a mere conjection about Menobranchus I suppose I must for the present be [1 word illeg] with Proteus
I think I should divide the order into 4 families
2. Proteidae — Proteus &
Menobranchus
[3] 3. Amphiumidae - Amphiuma
4. Salamandridae Salamanda, Triton
Cynops,Taricha , Seiranota,
Notophthalmus, Chioglossa,
Hynobius, Onychodactylus
Amblystoma, Aneides * Plethodon, Heredia+, Desmognathus, Hemidactylium, Batrachoseps
Spelerpes, Geotriton, Oedipus
Sieboldia__ Menopoma
____________________
My new genus Pectoglossa (P.[roceedings of the Z.[oological] S.[ociety] 1867. p. 698)5 is only Amblystoma,
Geotriton is interesting as the only form with sphenoidal teeth inhabiting the old world [.]
____________________
I need not[?] refer you to the Faun[a]. Japonica[.]6 Gray has described a new genus7(which I believe[?] good) a few years ago the specimen is in the B[ritish]. Mus[eum] but I have not seen it.
____________________
[4] Günther13 told me that someone[?] on the Continent (I think a Russian)14 had recently published a work15 on the Urodela.
With much[?] kind regards | I am| Yours very truly| G J Mivart [signature]
I will look over Tables with pleasure
I add a bit[?] of the Genera in Grays Catalogue which I convinced[?] myself (when I carefully went[?] through the B[ritish]. Mus[eum] Collection) were [1 word illeg.]
Bradybates = Pleurodeles16 | |
Euproctus. | |
Ommatotriton | All these I believe[?] |
Lophinus | are really Triton |
Cynops | |
Taricha |
Molge is only a species of Hynobius.
Heterotriton17 | |
Xiphonura | are really Amblystoma |
Ensatina |
Oedipus is a kind of Spelerpes.
Gray, J. E. 1850. Catalogue of the Specimens of Amphibia of the Collection of the British Museum Part II. Batrachia Gradientia, etc. London: The Trustees of the British
Museum.
Fauna Japonica, the first book written in a European language on the zoology of Japan, was published in five volumes between 1833 and 1850. Siebold, P. F. von, Temminck, C. J., Schlegel, H. De Haan, W. 1833-1850. Fauna Japonica. Leiden:
Lugduni Batavorum. The Japan Foundation Information Centre. n.d. Philipp Franz von Seibold. The Japan Foundation Information Centre Library <https://www.jpf.go.jp/e/about/jfic/lib/archive/pdf/1307mini_e.pdf> [accessed 21 January 2020]
Heck, J. G. and Baird, Spencer F. (translator and ed.) 1849. Iconographic Encyclopaedia of Science, Literature and Art. 2. New York: Rudolph Garrigue
[p. 257]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2295.2185)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2295,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2295