[1]1
Placer. N. E. Mindanao.2
July 16th. 1877
Dear Sir
I have just read with great interest your resumé in the "Geograp[hical]. Distribution"3 of what is known of the zoographical relationship of the Philippine Archipelago. I am now travelling in the Philippines with the object of collecting the Birds chiefly, but I hope also to transmit from time to time small collections of the other Vertebrate classes and also of the insects, which cannot fail to be of use in defining more precisely the place of the archipelago in the Oriental region. The Birds will be examined by the Marquis of Tweeddale4 and I believe Mr. Higgins5 will submit the Mammals, Reptiles, & Fish to [1 word illeg.] Dr. Gunther6 previous to their dispersal by sale. Although I have been at work only a few months, the results obtained in regard to the Birds go far to justify your opinion — that, though many new species doubtless remained to be discovered, it was improbable that such discovery would materially alter the broad general characteristics of the fauna of these islands as already known. I have procured representatives of some of the most typical Indo-Malayan genera, and these not in debateable[?] districts like Palawan7 and Sooloo[sic] 8, but in Cebu9 in the centre of the Archipelago and in Surigao10 and Dinagat11 on its Eastern limits. In Cebu I obtained a small wholly green Phyllornis12, in Surigao a Macronus13, and in the island of Dinagat a small Malacopteron14 and a Cymbirynchus[sic]15. These I have already sent to England together with three or four species of Sun-Birds (Aethopyga? and Anthreptes?)16, and some other birds, which, having no book of reference of any kind, I cannot name with any certainty. The Phyllornis, Macronus, and Malacopteron all closely resemble the common Bornean species but are all stunted in size.
In regard to the Mammalia I have sent little as yet and (with the exception of the Galeopithecus17) they are very scarce in the islands I have visited. I have reports however both from Europeans and natives of several species not heretofore recorded. Among these are a Tupaia18 in Mindanao and a "blind earth-rat" said to live underground in Cebu in burrows, where it is sometimes met with in digging wells. A Moschus19 is said to occur in Balabac20, which seems probable enough, and small "leopards" in Palawan — perhaps a re- [2]21 representative species of one of the small Bornean felines. I have also the description of an animal inhabiting the Calamaines22 which can only apply to a Gymnura23; whilst in Mindoro24 there is said to be a deer (?) with horns like those of Cervus Muntjac25 before the tynes26 are developed. I hope to have the opportunity of testing these reports in the course of the year, and, even if they prove to be unfounded, I can hardly doubt that the exploration of Balabac, Palawan, and the Calamaines will yield new mammals to swell the present meagre list. And it is more than possible that this chain of islands though politically Philippine will be found to be geographically Bornean. It has occurred to me as I write that the existence of Megapodius27 in Labuan28 may serve as a hint[?] towards determining a point of connexion of Palawan with the Mainland of Borneo. I think Mr. Low29 sent Calaenas30 also from Labuan. Neither Calaenas nor Megapodius were met or even heard of by me during the seven years I resided in Sarawak31 — part of which time I lived close to the Brunei frontier. I believe that the Monsoons play a not unimportant part in determining the [1 word illeg] introduction of species of birds in Borneo and the Philippines, and some [1 word illeg] chan[ge][?] of species may now be in process through their agency; but their influence would not affect the problem of the distribution of a bird with the habits of Megapodius. I do not know how Megapodius is distributed in the Philippines; but the Calaenas has been recorded by Peale32 from the island of Mangsi33 [sic] and it occurs in Cebu, Leyte,34 and Mindanao and is, I suspect, to be found on most of the islands.
It is a curious fact that no monkeys are found in Dinagat nor, by the testimony of the Padre and the natives, in the island of Siargao35 farther to the eastward. Both islands are of considerable extent, mountainous, and covered with virgin forest which affords a variety of fruits, and in both are found deer, rivernidae[?], Tarsius36, Galeopithicus, squirrels and I believe wild pigs — in fact all the mammals of the neighbouring larger islands except the [1 word crossed out] monkeys. These latter animals are sufficiently abundant on the mainland of the Surigao37 peninsula, which is separated from Dinagat by a strait 3 or more miles wide, and also in Leyte and Panaon38, and island at the southern extremity of Leyte.
In one of your letters written to me in Sarawak you mentioned an anomalous insect and intimated that Sir J. Lubbock39 was anxious to obtain specimens. I sent to Mr. Cutter40 a large series immediately after but as I broke off my connexion [3] connexion with him about that time I did not hear if the specimens reached their destination. I also kept a number of these insects in confinement in a glass jar with moss, rotten wood &c, for six weeks with the view of ascertaining something about their embryology; but though I was thus enabled to collect some notes on their habits, I observed nothing that could go to prove whether they were mature or in a larval stage. I subsequently found another variety in S'[ara]wak somewhat larger and [2 letters illeg.]enting the three broad dorsal plates; and lately in Dinagat I came across a third variety, similar to the first but with all the dorsal plates lined along their exterior edges with bright orange. Of these I have transmitted a suite to Mr. Higgins.
When you see Mr. Mitten41 will you kindly inform him that I am collecting the mosses but they are too few to send at present.
I remain, dear Sir, | Yours truly | A Everett42 [signature]
A. R. Wallace Esq{ui]re.
Sooloo, now known as Sulu, an island in the southernmost part of the Philippines.
<http://www.tourism.gov.ph/SitePages/InteractiveSitesPage.aspx?siteID=1049> [accessed 3 June 2015].
Possibly the William Cutter, naturalist's agent, to whom Wallace wrote in 1875, telling him claims Cutter had sold butterflies for him were 'preposterous'. WCP3101.3069 Wallace Letters Online. The Cutter family dealt with the British Museum in London and the Pitt Rivers in Oxford. Pitt Rivers Museum
<http://web.prm.ox.ac.uk/rpr/index.php/articles-index/12-articles/139-dealers-and-auctioneers/> [accessed 3 June 2015].
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2353.2243)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2353,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2353