[1]1
Telegraph & Rail2,
Shoreham, Kent.
L. C. & D. RLY.3
2[n]d. Dec[embe]r. [18]93
DARENT-HULME4,
SHOREHAM,
SEVENOAKS.
Dear Mr. Wallace
I was glad to hear your remarks on the time argument. The subject is a very difficult one and in the absence of definite data we can only hope to make approximate estimates. Of course we cannot take the Greeenland rate of glacier [2] advance5 as a standard but we can take it as evidence of what might be a rate for a time.
There will be as you observe checks and stops which must reduce the maximum. If you will turn to p.14 of my paper you will see that I have allowed for that but whether or not I have allowed enough may be a question. In my mind all the [3]6 Geol[ogical].evidence tends to shorten Croll's periods7 — The One great value of the Greenland observations lies in this. Geologists had determined upon the Alpine observations that the rate of growth or advance of glacier ice might be estimated at a maximum of say about 36 feet per annum. In accordance with this Croll's periods were adopted. Now if8 [4] such results were thought attributable to reconci[l]able with a 36 f[oo]t. advance surely that assumption must be modified if it is shown that the advance may have been at the rate of say 36 f[oo]t. per day instead of per annum.
Please accept a copy of my paper in Phil[osophical] Trans[actions]9 just out in which I give further reasons for a more limited chronology & believe me to be
Very truly yours, | Joseph Prestwich10 [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2478.2368)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2478,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2478