[115]
Dec[ember] 19, 1902
Dear Dr Wallace,
I am very much obliged to you for your last letter & I quite agree with you in the greater part of what you say — but I am rather inclined to think that Batorn[?] is [2] right in many cases with regain to discontinuous variation & that etc old adage "Nature which fruit for nature" is memoir [1 word illeg.] you.
In sent of the enormous variety of yours and many govern ranging every 100 miles or so to the Amazon valley in every valley [3] [116] of the Andes & in every island of the Malay Archipelago : do you think what natural selection the determining factor & every care. Is it not allowable to believe that many of these are within [1 word illeg.] which have perpetuation themselves ? I don't think that you at all agree with these ideas, but I think very much 1 [4] like your opinion on the matter : the great variety of write of differing species in a comparatively small area, with much the same climate & [3 words illeg.] to print to travelling more than Natural Selection — something more hap-hazard if one may be allowed to use the term.
Yours very truely
W.W. Fowler2
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2816.2706)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2816,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2816