THE CAMP,
SUNNINGDALE.
Feby 11’ 1905
My dear Wallace
I have not changed my opinion & you may quote the two passages indicated in my letter: nor have I seen any controversion of the view & questions of late years; but to tell you the truth I have not of late kept up my botanical reading, except for India.
Dyer1 you know has adopted our view, in a paper read, if I remember aright, to the Geographical Society, some years ago.2
Of course, there has been sporadic migration from South to North, here [2] these, as of the Malayan types all along the base of the Himalaya — but that is due to the disturbing influence of the Himalaya, offering the facilities of it’s [sic] hot humid lower ranges for the invasion of tropical types.
Have you seen a paper by a Mr Cockayne3 in Trans. N Zeald. Institute vol. XXXVI?4 on the flora of the Southern Island of New Zealand.5It is full of matter interesting to us, especially the accounts of the Rata forest in Auckland Islands, which seem to indicate an ancient land connection with New Zealand & is by far the most cogent botanical evidence known to me of the replacement of Land [3] by deep ocean. I can lend you the paper (see p. 312)
I am glad to hear that you enjoy your years & can think & work. I keep up a little botany by working up difficult genera of the Kew Herbarium. I am now at Impatiens & have been for 4 years now. The local aggregation of the species: India is quite unintelligable [sic]; no doubt all due to Insect agency.
I keep well except for transient attacks of Eczema that keep my legs & sometimes arms bandaged.
Ever sincerely yrs | J D Hooker.6 [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2844.2734)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2844,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on