THE CAMP.
SUNNINGDALE.
Jany 25 1908
My dear Wallace
I have been making further enquiries at the Herbarium respecting the possibility of Bentham1 having left any further mss respecting Spruce's2 collections there than you know of -: all in vain -: & when you consider the gigantic labours that Bentham was undertaking during a great part, if not all, of the time occupied by successive arrivals from Spruce you cannot wonder that he should not attempt to study them[.] There was the Flora Australiensis (7 vols).3 the Hong Kong Flora,4 two I think versions of De Candolle's Prodromus5 the British Flora,6 the Genera Plantarum7with me, the Presidentship [2] of the Linnean Society with its learned annual addresses & perhaps above all the Herbarium of 30000 named species, culled from that the Herbarium left to him by Seemann8 & from his own – all systematically arranged in genus covers — all written up with his own hand for the & gratuitously presented to Cambridge University. Lastly why should not the study of the Sprucean collections be left for Spruce himself to deal with on his return.
I do not know if you have seen the notice9 of Bentham's life which I drew up for the Annals of Botany. I have there attempted to set forth the vast amount of work taken up & carried out by Bentham — He had enough to do in receiving & distributing gratuitously Spruce's [3] collection & acting as his accountant purser & correspondent.
Ev sincerely Yrs | Jos D Hooker10
Daydon Jackson11 could possibly tell you if there is any numerical estimate of the Sprucean collection.
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP2901.2791)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP2901,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on