WCP2931

Letter (WCP2931.2821)

[1]1

Inverquharity

[Richmond]

[Tasmania]

28 / 3 / [19]092

My dear Dr. Wallace

You will think me strangely careless about your wishes in regard to seeds & bulbs, but I have been seeking help in all quarters. This is a grassy part of the country & flowers are not so plentiful & seeds of native plants, such as you which not easy to get. I sent you one lot that I got. I have just got another which goes herewith. I am afraid they are not very precious. I also enclose some bulbs in cotton wool. The only way I could get them was to dig them up in the [2] Bush when they were in flower with a good sod & plant them in my garden. where they soon died down. I have just dug them up, but they have all sprouted so I fear they will be no good. However, I send them on the chance. They are poor specimens anyhow. I could not secure the [1 word illeg.] ones. I can[’]t give you the names, but you will perhaps be able to classify them yourself if they are worth classifying.

I was pleased to hear that you had been "honoured" with a decoration3 ; though I never could see the use of a [3]4 decoration to a man who has made his mark in the world, is known already far & wide & rather honours the decoration than is honoured by it. I do see great use though in the decoration to a man who has done some noteworthy deed but not of a world famous [1 word illeg.] — an engineer who has saved a train at great personal risk &c. yet remains unknown & humble. I want [to] see more decorations of this kind — for humble people — who can wear it on their breasts & which will entitle them to [1 word illeg.], a [1 word illeg.] pension, a free pass [4] on the railways, or something of that sort. — a kind of Legion of Honour. It is strange that Land Nationalization[?]5 takes no hold on these Democratic Committees, as a declared end, though tax on the [1 word illeg.] value & compulsory purchase are widely advocated & bound to pass almost [1 word illeg.] I think — they are partly passed already; but the principle is not thoroughly understood & then by the wrong estates — chiefly big pastoras[?] & out of the way estates. What I am chiefly urging with Labour & the Lib[eral] Democratic parties is direct assault on that [5]6 Capitation which is the chief [1 word illeg. struck through] accomplice & support of Land Monopoly by these two measures —

(1) Increasing differentiation between the Earned & the Un.-earned Income — (Income from personal exertion v[ersus]. income[?] from property.) till it is all concentrated on the Unearned incomes — the difference is about 1/- on the one & only /8 on the other — and

(2) Duties v[ersus] inheritance, starting from £5000 (or some such sum free , & thence rapidly increasing & complete absorption at say 100.0007 [6] these 2 measures, with Land Tax & Compulsory purchase by Bonds would settle both Land [1 word illeg.] & [1 word illeg.] quickly — Even millionaire Carnegie8 is for allowing the millionaire his millions for life only, to be surrendered at his death.

But the Labour party will waste its efforts on a "living wage" — "minimum wage" "Eight hours" & such like which not only do not go to the root of the mischief but could not be enforced. The employer either drives a coach & four through the Act somehow are [7]9 the men who get this [1 word illeg.] low pay & work the long hours won’t "tell". — But the one great political issue we have which is overpowering[?] all of this — is between "Socialism" & Anti Socialism" as they express it — though that is not a correct description — It is really between the workers on one hand & the [1 word illeg.] & [1 word illeg.] on the other. Labour is getting a transfer every year & the leaders clearly recognise that the Land [1 word illeg.] is the bottom question though I can[’]t get them to concentrat[e] [8] their efforts mainly on that still all are beginning to recognise that with us as in England it is the Upper State Upper Houses that block its way. The Federal Upper House — the Senate — does not. It does not represent property at all. — With warm regards I remain

Yours always sincerely | A J Ogilvy10 [signature]

The orchids grew in a poor rather sandy soil & a dry climate.

Page numbered 24 in pencil in top RH corner and "Ogilvy" written in pencil in top LH corner of page.
Year deduced from birth and death dates of author.
ARW received the Order of Merit in 1908, awarded by the monarch for distinguished service in the military, science, art or literature and restricted to 24 living recipients.
Page numbered 25 in pencil in top RH corner
The author was a considerable landholder in Tasmania, but began to issue tracts on land nationalization in 1887. ARW wrote the introduction to Ogilvy’s book A Colonist's Plea for Land Nationalisation, Land Nationalisation Society, London, 1901.
Page numbered 26 in pencil in top RH corner and "28/3/09" is written at the RH centre top of the page.
The words "£5000", "free", and "complete absorption at say 100.000" are underlined in red pencil and a cross is red-pencilled in the LH margin next to the last words underlined.
Carnegie, Andrew (1835-1919). Scottish American industrialist and philanthropist.
Page numbered 27 in pencil in top RH corner.
British Museum stamp underneath.

Enclosure (WCP2931.8352)

[1]

Dr A.R.Wallace

I omitted in my letter to mention the following difficulty that occurs to me in regard to Rent being the equalizer of opportunities ("<Arena?>" p.404) — — it seems to me that Rent equalizes profits1 but not opportunities as represented. Is it not price of produce that equalizes opportunities? — Thus:—

A on the better land will not sell cheaper than he need2 because of his greater advantages. Price will be determined by supply and demand.

If Class A on the better land can't or don't supply all that is wanted, price will rise until it enables Class B on the worse land to produce too, giving them "ordinary" profits, that is profit enough to keep them going through not excessive3 profit such as Class A makes. If on the other hand Class A do supply all that is wanted, Class B have no "raison d'etre" and [2] should betake themselves to source other employment.

To divert Class A's excessive profit4 (i.e. unearned increment[?]) to the State may be right but it will make no difference to Class B's opportunities.

A.J.O.

Dr A. R. Wallace

P.S.5 This has lain for some time, forgotten in an addressed envelope, underneath others. I hope it is not urgent.

S.Hyder[?]

This word has been later underlined in blue pencil.
This word has been later underlined in blue pencil.
This word has been later underlined in blue pencil.
'Excessive profit' has been later underlined in blue pencil.
The postscript is written in a different hand.

Please cite as “WCP2931,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP2931