[1]1
House of Commons
March 16th 1898
My Dear Dr Wallace
I duly received your letter & delayed answering it till I had read your volume[.] I have just finished it & I think you have made an unanswerable case against compulsi[o]n[.] I am sending with this copies of the Bill2 just brought [to] me by the Government and I think of moving as an amendment to the second reading that no legislation compelling any form of vaccination will be a proper settlement of the question.
In general I agree with [2] most that you contend for, perhaps the point at which we may not differ is the extent to which vaccination may modify small pox, but as I have seen a case of small pox where the patient had the third attack of that disease, even small pox itself does not prevent it[s] recurrence twice[,] so variola can[’]t be expected,
With Kindest Regards | I am yours faithfully | G.B. Clark [signature]
P.S. Your Essay did not come with your letter & I put the letter aside until the volume turned up, It never came by post but a copy was given me afterwards by a keen antivaccinator GRC
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP3057.3025)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP3057,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP3057