[1]1
13 Barwick Road,
Forest Gate, E.
10 Ap[ril]. 1906
To Dr. Alfred R. Wallace,
Dear Sir,
I must thank you for your kind letter of the 4th. instant, in which you recommend me to read Thomas Child’s2 "Root Principles"3. I at once ordered the book & have now got it, & I must say it has surprised me, — not only by reason of its merits, but also because it sets forth with remarkable clearness many of the truths of which I have long been aware, & in some cases states them almost in the very words which I had been putting together for myself & others. This is to me quite remarkable. I refer particularly to the Threefold Nature of Being, the Symbolical interpretation of things, and God as the true "environment". I have not got through the book yet, but I am not likely to leave it until I have completely studied it. Already I have recommended it to a number of friends. All I will now say in criticism of it is that the theologic conclusion on p[age] 163 does not appear to me to be right: I do not think that an historic basis should be formed for Religion quite in that way. I hold that the Figure to whom the Christian "churches" look would stand in unimpaired majesty, & greater beauty, if not formally apotheosized; and that, in short, in proportion as we "build the tombs of the prophets" we are unjust both to them & to the [2] humanity which they came to save; and so tend to lose the eternal significance of their teaching by magnifying its historic setting. But I must not write too much. Certainly Haeckel4 is demolished, & in a way I had often wished to see.
I am really obliged to you for your letter, which I have shown to my wife & sons. It has been, as you see, of real value to me in bringing the book to my notice.
With reference to Sir O. Lodge5, it is curious that he came to Toynbee Hall University Settlement6, in Commercial St[reet]. E[ast]., a year ago, & gave a lecture at one of our discussion meetings there, on "The Reality of the Unseen". The address, considering what we expected from Dr. Lodge, was perhaps a little disappointing, for it dwelt mainly on Natural Selection without any particular reference to the Unseen, except the astronomical Unseen. In the debate that followed I tried to supply the deficiency by referring to divine & spiritual things, & Dr. Lodge in his reply then mentioned your name as that of an exponent of such views — mentioned it with some approbation, yet (it seemed) without then committing himself to the views. That is what rather set me upon reading your works. There have been many weekly meetings at Toynbee Hall since, & they are still going on, & the "New" views — but surely they are older than Plato7 — are turning the agnostic & the Sacerdotal positions alike, & are received with real interest & attention.
Yours faithfully | Edward Willmore8 [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP3241.3209)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP3241,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 6 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP3241