9. St. Mark's Crescent
Regent's Park. N.W.
Jany. 18th. 1869
Dear Dr. Hooker1
Thanks for the copy of the memorial,2 which I hope will not be forgotten when the British Museum comes to be moved and reconstituted.
I introduced Ethnology into my scheme for several reasons. It forms part at present of almost all local museums, and as it is certainly interesting and instructive I should have had more difficulty in justifying its omission altogether from a "Popular Museum" than its inclusion.
But I had another reason. [2] It is a very general opinion that Art Museums, à la South Kensington, are the things the people want, & while advocating the claims of Natural History I was glad to show that it might include a few typical illustrations of art.
It is no doubt going out of the sphere of a "Natural History Museum" to include art at all, but it is equally so to show any of the economic uses of natural products. Yet for a popular museum intended to give information to the very ignorant and excite their interest in Nature, [3] it would no doubt be advisable to exhibit these.
Believe me | yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
Dr. J. D. Hooker
P.S. Feb. 9th.
I found this lying in my writing case & fear I forgot to send in you [sic] in reply & your kind remarks on my little Museum Article.3
ARW [signature]
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP3807.3724)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP3807,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on