[1] 1
30 Cumberland Road,
Kew.
1st.. November 1910.
My dear Meldola,2
Thanks for your postcard. Perhaps I ought to explain further what I said about Lyell3 and the Geological Society4 and Oxford5.
The opposition with which Lyell was met at the Geological Society, has [2] died (if it is even now dead) very slowly6. I have talked to many of the old generation who shook their heads gravely over "poor Lyell's fads." In the present generation the desire to go back to "the beginning["] is still very strong — and when this feeling is not dominant Lyell's services are minimised in Comparison [3] with those of Hutton7.
At Oxford unfortunately Buckland8 was succeeded by men of the old school — Phillips9 — who always "sat on the fence" and Prestwich10, Catastrophist11 to the last. Both dear old fellows, but not helpful for evolution. Nor does the present holder of the Chair12 (entre nous) — though a man of real genius — count reverence for "the falhers" [sic] among his [3] many virtues. I think that Poulton13 & Bourne14 are fully aware of the greatness reflected in Oxford by Lyell.
Ray Lankester15, who belonged to Exeter, Lyell's College, got them to put a portrait of Lyell in the Common room — He is a firm believer in Lyell.
But Oxford does not regard Lyell as Cambridge does Darwin16.
I am glad you are going to review the little book17. Hooker18 & Wallace have both written me the most charming letters. Wallace was greatly surprised to read the quotation on page 8519, of Lyell's letter to Herschel20 in 1836[.]
Yours very faithfully | J W Judd [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP3977.3918)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP3977,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 29 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP3977