76½, Westbourne Grove Bayswater. W.
Nov. 8th. 1867
Dear Newton
The only new species is my Spizaetus nanus, but the specimen is poor & wants the tip of the upper mandible.
I have a good specimen of Spizaetus kieneri, but I forget if that has already been figured. Look & see if I quote a figure in the Mss. and let me know to whom I shall send the specimen. I shall be back here for a few days on [2] November 20th (I am now going to Newcastle to Lecture). All the winter I shall be staying in the country & my address is, HurstpierpointSussex.
I have no sternum of Hierax: what you say about it is very curious, and as I know nothing of it I should prefer your putting a note about its doubtful affinities. [3]
I have just been looking over Huxley's paper in the Proceedings of [the] Zool[ogical]. Soc[iety].1 and am very doubtful of some of his affinities. However I shall study it more closely by & by. Does not the fact of his finding closeaffinity between Cypselus and Hirundo
Podargus & Cancroma
indicate that palatal structure varies in accordance with general modifications of form & eye & function and may be comparatively unimportant? [4]2I cannot think this one character sh[oul]d override differences of the sternum pterolysis, egg & foot structure & other good characters.
Yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
A[lfred]. Newton Esq.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP4020.3963)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP4020,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 12 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4020