The Dell, Grays, Essex.
March 28th. 1875
Dear Newton1
Mss. received I am sorry you did not keep it [one word illegible] as I sh[oul]d have profited by your fuller notes. I have just looked over the [one word illegible] &c & find many valuable suggestions I shall adopt.
I think however in a work like mine I sh[oul]d not diverge from the classification of any new & authoritative work. Sclater2 & Saloni[?], keep Chisnididae[?] & Thinocoridae3 separate — You say they are true Charadriidae4. You may be right but it will be for me to follow S. & S’s arrangement.
[2] Again I cannot accept Glareola5 as "true Charadriidae", as it differs in so many external characters,- as much say as Motacillidae6 does from Muscicapidae7,— yet I presume its skeleton is not nearer that of Charadrius8, than those of these two last genera are to each other. I am quite disposed to admit that a worked diversity of sternum[?] regimes that has birds that sh[oul]d be placed in distinct families, but not that a marked similarity necessitates that they sh[oul]d be muted[?] in one family— all external differences withstanding.
On looking hastily through the other groups I see many valuable hints. On group over there for final [3] corrections I may have to trouble you with a few guesses. I shall certainly separate — Menuridae9 and Atrichidae10— as you propose. Do you consider these related,— that is in Atrichidae never to Menura than to any other forms?
I will gladly separate Certhiidae11 & Sittidae12. I presume the Sittidae of the "Handbook" will constitute the latter family.
I see you gave several suggested alterations in Sylviidae13. There I have depended wholly on Tristram14, who took the trouble to give me a complete classification of the whole family with all the genera & these contents[?]— I gave this all on his authority and shall not therefore like to make alterations in it without consulting him again, which would cause more trouble & delay. These large, difficult, [4] and wide-spread families are of little importance in Geog-Dist15 & I do not propose to offer the classifications I adopt as having any authority, but merely as following that of the best writers on the subject.
I note you object to the position of some of the American families,— but in these I follow Sclater & Salum[?] who ought to know.
When I adopt divisions of families as you suggest, e.g. Euberigidae[?] — I will ask you to look over them Mss. again to see if the genera are right.
I will send you the Neotrop[ical] & Eth.[iopian] Regions tomorrow to Cambridge
Yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP4040.3984)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP4040,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4040