WCP4057

Letter (WCP4057.4000)

[1]

Rosehill, Dorking

Jan[uar]y 7th, 1877

Dear Newton1

I want to call your attention as a V.P. of the Zool[ogical]. Society & active member of the Publication Committee, to a subject I have long thought of, or rather a deficiency I have long felt the want of, & I should think you & every other worker must have done so too. I mean the want of a good subject-index to the Proceedings of the Zool. Soc[iety]. The present mechanical species-index has sometimes almost driven me wild. In the indices of 1860/ or 70/ there are sometimes a dozen or 20 references to one species, but on laboriously referring to these through perhaps 8 in ten volumes, not more than one or two contain any information whatever. The rest are either additions to Soc. Menagerie [2] "promises to send to Society's Menagerie" — "references to species as not known to, or not seen by a given writer or traveller",— references to the species as being unlike some other species, & a whole host of similar items which are worse than useless inasmuch as they occupy waste much valuable time. Again we are sent to every species mentioned in Gulliver's innumerable papers as blood-corpuscles,— and in every anatomical paper,— such as "Flowers in Anatomy of Moschus moschiferus"— every time the sp. name occurs during the paper is separately mentioned in Index.

But on the other hand — the attempt to get at the information scattered through the long series of volumes on any given subject is almost hopeless. If I want all [3] the information,— (1) on any family or order of Animals,— (2) on the zoology of any country or locality — (3) on the anatomy of any group (4) on the description of new species in any group (5) on classification (6) on habits,— and on many other subjects,— I have practically no index at all!

Now as we are approaching the end of another decade, I am in hopes you will propose & urge with all the weight of your authority, the absolute necessity of a really good and intelligent Index of subjects for the whole series of volumes down to 1880. Of course it would cost a good deal, but whatever it would cost it would [4] be money well-spent.

I would also of course have the Index to each volume prepared in the same way,— the specific names only being given where a description of some kind was given, and when the name was merely mentioned in a list; as that would be easier found by the locality-Index.

An Index Committee might be required to draw up a systematic scheme.

I hope this idea meets with you approbation & that you will press it.

Believe me | Yours very faithfully | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]

Prof. Newton F.R.S.

Alfred Newton (1829 — 1907), English zoologist and ornithologist, Professor of Comparative Anatomy at Cambridge where he published extensively on ornithology.

Please cite as “WCP4057,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 24 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4057