Frith Hill, Godalming
March 15th. 85/
My dear Newton1
Many thanks for the copy of your art. Ornithology from Enc. Britt. I have look through it with much interest and find an admirable resumé both of the progress of Bird study & especially of Bird Classification.
Only on one point will I make any remark. I do not think your arguments in favour of the Ratite as the earliest type of Birds are very strong, while I feel pretty sure that existing Ratite are (some of them)[illeg.] almost certainly descended from Carinatae. In fact [2] the absence of the keel is simply the result of the very long continued disuse of wings & the almost complete loss — hence it cannot be the characteristic mark of a fundamental division of Birds.
I have now almost wholly given up Nat. Hist. for Political & Social Science, but I still take the greatest interest in all the principles & important advances of [3] Natural History.
Believe me | yours very faithfully | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
[4]2
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP4063.4007)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP4063,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on