Broadstone, Wimborne
May 3rd. 1907
Revd. Archdeacon Colley1
Dear Sir
The picture you send me is not like what I saw. From the first appearance of the filmy white patch on Monck's2 coat the white patch preserved its tolerably regular outline, being only "cloudy" in colour & apparently softness, never with any such irregularity (suggesting actual vapour) as in your drawing. By the time the figure was separated [2] from Monck & drew away from him, it had formed into definite white drapery covering it from head to foot, with no vapouriness or cloudiness (such as your picture shows). It simply grew into drapery over a female form — not one particle escaping into irregularly cloudy matter.
Of course this was one case only & in full daylight. [3] These things never happen exactly alike, & you know best whether the picture represents what you saw.
Allow me to congratulate you on the verdict in your favour though you ought to have had more damages on the libel — & would have had if the Judge had not been against you.
Yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
The picture received & returned today A.R.W
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP4072.4016)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Envelope addressed to "Revd. Archdeacon Colley, Stockton Rectory, Warwickshire", with stamp, postmarked "BROADSTONE | A | MY 3 | 07". Pencil note on front of envelope "With copy to 55 saying how our accounts agree & his definition of a medium"; postmark on back. [Envelope (WCP4072.4017)]
Please cite as “WCP4072,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on