WCP4074

Letter (WCP4074.4019)

[1]

Old Orchard,

Broadstone,

Dorset.

Feb[ruar]y. 7th.

1912

Dear Mr. Harting

I return you the paper on "Homing of Dogs" — & I'm rather curious that so many cases have been already noticed in America. But these are all so devoid of essential details as to be quite worthless for the purpose [2] of determining the process by which the animals do find their way home.

Definitions of "Instinct" are difficult because the whole idea is loose. The act of a child sucking is called (by many) an instinct, whereas it is a "reflex action" essential to life — As well call breathing an instinct.

At the other extreme is the bees' making the hexagonal cell, with the the [sic] three planes at the base of each cell at such an [3] angle as to use the least material possible. The early writers declared that the bee must have solved a difficult mathematical problem, in order to do this! But Darwin showed that the exact process of cell-building was quite simple, & needed no knowledge whatsoever, while as there are always old & young bees in every hive the actual work is done by imitation. Lloyd Morgan1 has shown, that chicks and lambs have no knowledge of what is food, or of their own mothers, but learn by trial and error [4]

and a simple "reflex action" of following what they see in motion.

I therefore define true "instinct" (as usually supposed) to be — "knowledge without teaching or experience" — and such knowledge I maintain, has not yet been proved to exist!

I hope you will get a committee to really work out the "homing" problem, from this point of view.

Yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]

Morgan, Conwy Lloyd (1852-1936). British ethologist and psychologist.

Please cite as “WCP4074,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 28 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4074