WCP4218

Letter (WCP4218.4283)

[1]

Parkstone, Dorset.

Feb[ruar]y 13th 1891

Dear Mr Cockerell

Thanks for the notes on Coleoptera1 by Mr Fowler. He has written to me, apparently in ignorance of what I had written in 1st Ed[ition] of "Island Life", & under the impression that I am going to commit myself to the statement that all these beelles [beetles] are peculiar to Britain! It is quite amusing how he and others think it necessary to warn me & to give me their decided opinion that none are peculiar! So I have written to him to thank [2] him and to explain. I shall be glad of the notes from the Catalogue of European Beetles, and will make out the list myself with what notes & remarks I think necessary, & then perhaps may ask Mr. Fowler to look at the proof. Janson’s remark is suggestive. Note about Loddigesia2 very useful.

I have had a long and very badly written letter from Galton3 crticising [criticising] some of my suggested experiments — but I think mistakenly. I shall write to him again with some explanations & then I do not [3] see that I can do more.

I suggested some experiments something like yours, & many others. I do not quite agree with you that if acquired characters are inherited they would might only be so very rarely — If inherited (to be of any use in the theory of evolution, & that is the whole question) they ought to be inherited as frequently as other characters are inherited, that is, I presume, in about half the offspring. If only one in 100 exhibited the character how could you possibly say it was not a normal variation in that individual? Only by the very [4] frequent inheritance could you prove that there was any inheritance at all! I think you will see this. But it is too elaborate a question to discuss in letters.

Yours very faithfully | Alfred R Wallace [signature]

Coleoptera is an order of insects commonly called beetles.
Loddigesia is a type of hummingbird
Refers to Sir Francis Galton, a tropical explorer, anthropologist and eugenicist and a cousin of Charles Darwin.

Published letter (WCP4218.6902)

[1] [p. 875]

I suggested some experiments something like yours, and many others. I do not quite agree with you that if the acquired characters are inherited, they might only be so very rarely. If inherited (to be of any use in the theory of evolution, and that is the whole question) they ought to be inherited as frequently as other characters are inherited, that is, I presume, in about half the offspring. If only one in 100 exhibited the character how could you possibly say it was not a normal variation in that individual? Only by the very frequent inheritance could you prove that there was any inheritance at all! I think you will see this. But it is too elaborate, a question to discuss in letters.

Please cite as “WCP4218,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 27 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4218