WCP4564

Letter (WCP4564.4875)

[1]

Old Orchard,

Broadstone,

Wimborne.

June 27th. 1909

My dear Meldola1

I have just read your excellent article in "Nature" on "Darwin and Modern Science".2 You had a difficult task, & have done it well, and I hope your mild exposé & protests will open some people’s eyes to the absurdity & incongruity of such persons as Bateson3 and De Vries4 having so prominent a place in a Darwinian Celebration.

I have only, so far, had [2] time to read two papers — those of Thiselton-Dyer,5 and of Hans Gadow.6 The former is very good & thoroughly suitable to the occasion — the latter as thoroughly bad & unsuitable. It hardly refers to Darwin7 except to criticise him, and when the writer does bring him in, he wholly misstates his views — See p. 322 — last par., & p. 325 — last 11 lines — which imply that Darwin traced each species to a single pair! & that the view of whole groups of individuals being modified together was Andrew Murray’s8 [3] not Darwin’s! And the Editors allowed this to pass without pointing out its complete falsity. It Such a statement really plays into the hands of the Mutationists, and its utter futility was why Darwin always rejected it, except as a rare event which might possibly have sometimes led to species formation, but was wholly unnecessary.

The writing is often so obscure as to be unintelligible — as on p. 332 where the lines 6-8 are pure nonsense!

Thiselton-Dyer did not go to Cambridge, because he says (in a letter just received — "I could not stand being told that Darwin’s mantle had fallen upon Bateson, — that the [4] Origin of Species has still to be discovered, and that specific differences have no reality". He adds that he was afraid that under such provocation he tmight lose his temper!

I may tell you that I was asked about a year ago to contribute to the volume, which I declined for many reasons, — and am glad I did. I shall read Poulton’s9 chapter next, then perhaps De Vries & Bateson, — & then others as time & inclination moves me. I am struggling with my new book — a development of my Lecture at R. Instn. in which I shall be able to treat and discuss the some fundamental problems of organic Evolution, both fully & popularly.

Yours very truly| Alfred R. Wallace [signature]

Meldola, Raphael (1849-1915). British chemist and entomologist.
Meldola, R. 1909. Darwin and Modern Science Essays in Commemoration of the Centenary of the Birth of Charles Darwin and of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Publication of the “Origin of Species”. Nature 80 (June), pp. 481-485.
Bateson, William (1861-1926). Pioneering British geneticist and supporter of the work of Gregor Mendel. One of the key figures behind the modern synthesis in evolutionary biology.
de Vries, Hugo (1848-1935). Dutch botanist and geneticist, best known for his rediscovery of the work of Gregor Mendel (along with Carl Correns and Erich von Tschermak) in the late 1890’s.
Thiselton-Dyer, William Turner (1843-1928). Leading British botanist, and the third director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Gadow, Hans Friedrich (1855-1928). German zoologist and zoogeographer.
Darwin, Charles Robert (1809-1882). British naturalist, geologist and author, notably of On the Origin of Species (1859).
Murray, Andrew Dickson (1812-1878). British lawyer, entomologist and botanist. Assistant secretary to the Royal Horticultural Society 1860-1865.
Poulton, Edward Bagnall (1856-1943). British entomologist. Hope Professor of Zoology at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Jesus College.

Envelope (WCP4564.4876)

Envelope addressed to "Prof. R. Meldola F.R.S., 6 Brunswick Square, London. W.C., with stamp, postmarked "BROADSTONE | A | JU 27 | 09". [Envelope (WCP4564.4876)]

Please cite as “WCP4564,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 5 June 2025, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4564