Parkstone, Dorset.
May 2nd. 1890
R. Murray Esq.
Dear Sir
Your case for the mutilated cat producing tailless or imperfect-tailed kittens would be extremely interesting and valuable if it could be proved — (1) that that there was no imperfect-tailed male cat in the neighbourhood who might have been father of the kittens, — but if as you say, all her progeny have since been imperfectly tailed that would be improbable, — and (2) that the cat herself had not an imperfect tail before it was cut off, — and (3) that the mother [2] or father of the cat had quite perfect tails. If you have good evidence on all these points you should send an account of the facts to "Nature" in which — this week — there is an account of a similarly short & crooked tailed cat producing tailless or crook-tailed kittens; but this is nothing extraordinary because the common Malay cats have either stumpy or variously crooked tails and the Manx cats the same[.] Many abnormalities, when once produced naturally, [word illeg. crossed-out] are strongly heritable, while hitherto there is actually no good case (well proved) of a [3] mutilation being inherited, while there are many striking cases of non-inheritance — the docked tails of horses & dogs, the cramped feet of Chinese women, & the circumcision of the Jews, which after being constantly practised for 30 centuries is not in the slightest degree inherited.
Your case therefore would be most interesting if well-established.
Your very faithfully | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
[4]Dr A Russel Wallace1
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP4776.5152)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP4776,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 19 April 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4776