9 St. Mark's Crescent N.W.
March 22nd 1869
Dear Sir Charles,
I return you Darwins' letter1 with thanks. I have read Tyndall's2 books[?]3 on Glaciers very carefully, & believe Moseley's4 theory5 to be quite inconsistent with his & Forbe's6 facts. The whole cause and mode of the motion of Glaciers seems to be still a mystery, but I do not see that Moseley's argument in any way proves it can not be due to gravitation, because his experiment [2] on which his theory calculation is entirely founded, is one which seems to have been made under conditions such as never occur in a glacier.
Dr. Smith7 has returned the proof,8 but I am sorry to say has insisted on cutting out the last par. & quotation, on the grounds that it interferes with the effect of the concluding theory. I have taken out altogether the passage about the erect trees of supposed post glacial age, as there seems so much doubt about the [3] facts.
On the question of Glaciers, — Tyndall puts among his ascertained facts a conclusion, that a mass of ice, even on a level, will be spread out over the surface by superincumbent pressure, and of course must spread on the side of greatest slope of the ground. This will of course apply to the case of a glacier at or near a watershed supposing its thickness was great at that elevation.
Wishing you a pleasant Easter tour.
Believe me| Yours very truly | Alfred R. Wallace [signature]
Sir C. Lyell. Bart.
Status: Edited (but not proofed) transcription [Letter (WCP4880.5281)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP4880,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on 8 May 2024, https://epsilon.ac.uk/view/wallace/letters/WCP4880