[1]1
[No address]2
28. I. [18]963
My dear Mr Dyer,
I received pp.[pages] 64 of the Flora Capensis4 vol[ume]. yesterday, and have gone over it as far as the limited time before this day’s mail allowed. The corrections & suggestions in black ink are partly typographical, partly Cape-Dutchy. To some a? is prefixed, for not all are worth taking up, and of some I am not quite sure what the M[anu]S[cript] intended[.]
Now as to our way of writing certain names. We I regret to say, write Simon’s Town, Simon’s Bay. With some concurrence of local scholars, I write Simonstown just as Kingstown is written. Now here is the crux. If one separates the Simon from the Town, then the apostrophic mark & the s must go in. If we drop the ’ then the words must be united. On the whole, I think the ’s will have to be retained before such words as Bay, Kloof5 &c. as in Cape practice. But wherever English custom of compounding applies one should write Capetown, Kingwilliamstown, Queenstown, Grahamstown. And Cape scholars & careful writers do so, although the Government officials write Graham’s Town &c. out of conservative’s cussedness & red-tapery. They have no excuse, because the name of Capetown was "Kaapstad" all in one word, yet they will write Cape Town. I have gibed at them much to no effect, & pointed out the awful character of such names as King William’s Town & Hermanus Petrus Fontein6.
Of course the suggestions are to take, or to leave if any intentional system has been arrived at previously.
Baur’s7 plants from Bazija or Bazeia, must be taken as from Tembuland†8. That is the division now, and the word Kaffraria9 is altogether
†not Kaffraria wh[ich].[?] please alter.
[2]10
out of use; there was once a crown-colony of British Kaffraria & an independent ([1 word illeg.]) Kafirland for which last the Rev[erend]. R. Baur11 latinized on his labels Kaffraria Transkeiana. I begged him to drop it & he did: writing "Flora Trans-Keiana" right enough12.
I have run through in red ink such additions as collation with Herb[arium]. [1 word illeg.]13 could give with certainty. If the time of the method followed precludes their use, it is easy to put them on one side. Bolus14 is not returned from his botanical trip with Flanagan15 hence he has not seen these sheets.
Let me congratulate you on thus much of the work. I do not intend, as you laughingly foreboded in your last, to criticize. Partly, I am not competent all round, still more it is not for us out here to receive a great work done at a distance under great difficulties with the critical spirit.
I hope you will commend me to the veteran author with whatever New Year good Wishes are available with February so near.
I am sending some Antholyza nervosa16. One other matter. Prof[essor] Wallace had from me17 [3] a M[anu]S[cript]. on the Cape as a future centre for export fruit growing[,] being expansion of a few pages published in the Kew Bulletin18. I think it has reached him too late to be incorporated in his book, for he has sent me for comment a full chapter of his own, I am sorry to say — a pretty bad one. May I ask you to receive the M[anu]Script]. if he should send it to your care & put it with a pigeonhole pro tem[pore].19 ? I have no correspondent at home whom I can ask this favour. Wallace was told he could take it bodily over without alteration & without acknowledgement, but as he has sent other copy, it has doubtless reached him too late. He can either cancel his own & take mine, or keep his own & send over mine to Kew20 — if you allow.
Faithfully | P. MacOwan [signature]
Year deduced from birth and death dates of author.
4.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
22.
Status: Draft transcription [Letter (WCP5539.6297)]
For more information about the transcriptions and metadata, see https://wallaceletters.myspecies.info/content/epsilon
Please cite as “WCP5539,” in Beccaloni, G. W. (ed.), Ɛpsilon: The Alfred Russel Wallace Collection accessed on